King James Onlyism Before Peter Ruckman

Posted: June 12, 2014 in King James Only Debate
Tags: , , ,

Dr. Elisha Weismann

Contrary to critics like James White, Rick Norris, Fred Butler, JD Hall, Doug Cutelick, and all modern professional liars, the King James Only view did not begin with Peter Ruckman, Ruckman was merely instrumental in causing professing Baptists to quit riding the fence on the issue.

Thomas Morris posted the following quote in a group on Facebook ran by a great Jewish brother of mine (“Boaz Baptist”):

Hey look! William Lyon Phelps was “King James only” in 1922. Phelps was an honored Professor of English at Yale for over 30 years. Listen to what he says,

“The Elizabethan period — a term loosely applied to the years between 1558 and 1642 — is properly regarded as the most important era in English literature…the crowning achievement of those spacious times was the Authorized Translation of the Bible, which appeared in 1611…our English translation is even better than the original Hebrew and Greek. There is only one way to explain this…I am confident that the Authorized Version was inspired. Now as the English-speaking people have the best Bible in the world, and as it is the most beautiful monument ever erected with the English alphabet, we ought to make the most of it, for it is an incomparably rich inheritance, free to all who can read. This means that we ought invariably in the church and on public occasions to use the’ Authorized Version; all others are inferior.”

(Phelps, William L. Human Nature in the Bible. New York: Scribner, 1922, pp. ix-xii)

This is just one of many such authors that we know that have supported, promoted, endorsed, and defended the King James Bible Only position long before Peter Ruckman started challenging the Bible agnostics at Bob Jones University and writing books about the professional con artists that they helped produce and send into “fundamental Baptist” churches.

Just a little reminder that the KJVO critics are wrong (as usual).

  1. dustin germain (@paperhymn) says:

    Why do you keep on moderating my comments? If you don’t want anyone commenting, you might as well close the combox

    • drjamesa says:

      EVERYONE’S comments are ‘moderated’. It keeps spammers and other idiots from posting cuss words, and links to porno sites or Calvinist trash blogs. Does not your boss JD Hall moderate comments on his website? I have never seen ONE comment of mine approved there, so get off your Calvie horse and quit feeling sorry for your hypocritical self.

      Furthermore, if you followed my Twitter, you would have read that I was gone all weekend moving to another city. And furthermore, I am at least 8 hours or more ahead of those of you in the States, so stop whining about not getting replies 5 minutes after you post them. The fact that I have allowed you to post ANYTHING on my website despite all the crying you’ve done claiming otherwise is far more than you deserve, particularly after I’ve told you why ONE POST was not posted, and told you the criteria for getting it posted WHICH YOU FAILED TO COMPLY WITH.

      And finally, it’s my blog. If I wanted to simply make up my own arbitrary rules, and apply them to whosoever I choose, why would you as a deterministic Calvinist have a problem with that? 🙂

Leave Godly Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s