Posts Tagged ‘Donald Trump’

Dr. James A., PhD

In a shark-jumping tactic to assist crooked Hillary overtake Donald Trump’s presidency, the CIA (at least as far as the mainstream media tells us) has “confirmed” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump. Infowars (1st hour, Dec 14, 2016, with Larry Nichols) reports that the CIA is actively attempting to convince the electoral college to change their vote (or at least abstain until “further investigation” can be conducted. Why “further” investigation is necessary if there was conclusive evidence is beyond me, but I digress). Ah! Remember when Democrats complained that FBI Director Comey was in violation of the “Hatch Act” for “attempting to influence the election”! Apparently, the CIA is exempt.

Donald Trump has dismissed this “Russia did it” propaganda for the conspiratorial fake news that it is. Others, such as intelligence specialist Steve Pieczenik-who claimed that the FBI was responsible for leaking the information to Wikileaks-has also harpooned the Russian shark. But the defense liberal Democrats foist upon the safety-pin generation is that the CIA has no standing in politics, and is therefore an unbiased third-party providing only intelligence that affects the national security of the country.

I beg to differ.

From the CIA’s official, verified Twitter account, behold the CIA’s agenda to promote LGBTism. I have warned about the LGBT Trojan Horse in other articles (The Daniel Trap), how it is a globalist agenda to destroy Christianity and provoke God’s wrath. I think this proves it. What on earth is an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY doing promoting political and social issues like LGBTism? The CIA claims they PUSHED the agenda for “fairness and equality in the workplace” and were instrumental in playing a key role in providing an LGBT inclusive work environment.

Therefore, the CIA is not simply an intelligence agency designed to provide the president with sensitive information for the protection of national interests, but is actively involved in politics by engaging in propaganda that shapes the moral views of the country. If the CIA has this kind of stake in ethics, then the Democrat’s and traitor Republicans can not argue that the CIA is not motivated by politics. And, if the CIA can be shown to be involved in politics, there’s no grounds to oppose objections that they may have a political motivation for claiming that Russia interfered with the election.

cia

Furthermore, the CIA also claimed that Russia hacked the GOP and simply withheld the information. There’s three reasons why this is ludicrous.

  1. If the Republicans had hack-worthy dirty on Trump, they would have used it. Republicans fought Trump hard in the primaries, started Never Trump in the general, and are still trying to unseat him in the electoral college, not to mention they didn’t contribute one dime to Trump’s campaign. Russia hacking the GOP doesn’t eliminate the knowledge of what other Republicans would have already known about Trump before the “hack”. Even if Russia hacked the GOP, that wouldn’t prevent Republicans from using information against Trump they were already privy to prior to any hack.
  2. If the Russians gave the information to Trump to use against other Republicans, then every one of them were silent about their source. If Trump would have used any information about something gleaned from hacked emails, any Republican would’ve immediately seized on the opportunity to accuse Trump of obtaining illegally obtained classified or private information. No Republican ever accused Trump of using hacked dirt on them to win the primary election.
  3. During the general election, intelligence agents met with Hillary to claim that Russia may be involved in interfering with the election. However, no intelligence agents ever met with Trump. Now don’t you think Trump deserved to be briefed by intelligence agencies if the party whose ticket he is on was hacked? Or do intelligence agencies only brief Democrat candidates when the DNC is “hacked”, but leave Republicans in the dark? When only one candidate gets “briefed” that smacks of partisanship, and more likely, a Plan B because the real polls, and the thousands attending Trump rallies, were showing an inevitable Hillary loss.

Vice President-Elect, Mike Pence, is also known for his opposition to the LGBT agenda. Could it be that the CIA is afraid that Pence will be a thorn in the LGBT agenda that the CIA admitted pushed for? Or perhaps Trump’s wall will put a damper on those Fast & Furious operations and ruin those Barry Seal deals with the Mexican Cartels!

One thing is clear, the other…not so much. What is not clear-and frankly, more likely fake news-is that Russia had anything to do with the election. What is clear is that the CIA has a political motivation to make it look that way.

 

NOTE: Please see also our other article on the things that Russia would have had to know to even consider hacking the DNC

Dr. James A., PhD, Paralegal

Liberals are doing everything they can to stop Trump. Recently, a lawsuit was conveniently refiled from another jurisdiction outside of New York state by an anonymous person claiming Trump raped “her” at a party hosted by Jeff Epstein, a convicted sex offender. Ironically, the liberal media never mentioned that Bill has been a frequent guest of Epstein. Trump had once been to a single event  hosted by Epstein in Florida (not even the state where the allege rape “occurred”), and immediately left and never attended another one.

However, the media is planning on utilizing this lawsuit in a manner of what philosophy dubs a “straw man” fallacy. The straw man fallacy is where your opponent creates a false caricature of you as if it’s your belief, action, or statement, and then attacks the caricature as if the straw man is really you, and claims victory for successfully attacking it. This is what this lawsuit is. I’m going to explain some legal proceedings that shed a little more light on this as well to further prove my point because most of the time, the public is in abject ignorance about how court systems work (which is one reason why we have so many riots against police).

First, the lawsuit was initially filed in another state and dismissed. It has been refiled in New York which does not have jurisdiction over the case. One has to wonder why a judge would even permit it to be refiled in another state. But of course, New York has already proven that its political figures will attack Trump (NY Attorney General, for example). Furthermore, the statute of limitations for this case has been exceeded by several years. I am surprised the judge even allowed it to be filed, but sometimes, the court doesn’t catch that right away until another party raises the issue. Most people think a judge reads every complaint, and that’s just not true. Most of them are skimmed over and filed by clerks or other judicial assistants. In fact, many attorneys can simply take a document to court and use the clerks electronic stamping machine and have the clerk open a docket file for it. And there you have it, Trump raped someone because a lawyer drafted a complaint and stamped a docket number on it.

Secondly, the case was dismissed for failing to state an actionable claim. Liberals are claiming that it was dismissed on a “technicality” which is highly unlikely. When a pro se lawsuit is filed, judges are bound to “construe liberally” the plaintiffs lawsuit (Haines v Kerner, 404 US 519 (1972)). In other words, because a pro se litigant often lacks the legal expertise, the judge does not hold a pro se plaintiff to the same standards. This means it is more likely that the case was dismissed on more than just “technical” grounds. Perhaps alleging that the event occurred in an abandoned house was part of the problem.

Thirdly, many people are not aware of how a lawsuit actually works. When a lawsuit is filed, after it is reviewed, it goes through the “pleadings stage”. The case does not normally get dismissed sua sponte (on the courts own initiative) when a lawyer files the case as opposed to pro se cases where the judge normally rules under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that the case has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Most of these cases survive the initial pleading stages when just the minimal requirements of pleadings are met. That’s NOT a big deal. It’s how the system works.

Where most cases get the boot, is when the defendant in a case files to summarily dismiss the case by filing a motion for summary judgment (FRCP 56) or motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12 ( (b) or (c)). But first, we need to explain the difference between matters of fact, and matters of law. A matter of fact is something that a jury decides. A matter of law is what a judge decides. A matter of law would be something like whether or not the state has a provision that makes an action a crime. For example, if I sue you for having blue hair, it would be failure to state a claim because there’s no legal provision that prohibits that (not to mention that it would be patently frivolous). However, if there were one, then there’s the question of whether the person accused actually had blue hair, which would be a matter of fact. If the facts are disputed, then any material facts in dispute must be heard by a jury. This doesn’t mean that the facts are true, it just means that any fact that is relevant to proving a particular element of a legal allegation must be heard by a jury if there is a disagreement among the parties about the facts (some of those factual contentions are minimized even further toward trial preparations as the Rules of Evidence have additional requirements for evidentiary standards of documents and witnesses).

Sometimes factual denials and admissions are done at the pleading stage. The court usually gives the defendant 30 days to file an “Answer” once the lawsuit is served by a service process (either by a process server or sheriff). In that Answer, the defendant will categorically admit or deny the numbered paragraphs in the complaint. Any facts not disputed are normally deemed admitted. Some facts also are materialized through the “discovery” process which uses written interrogatories, production of documents, and depositions.

Once all of these stages are completed, the judge orders pretrial proceedings. Time does not permit me to get into the details about that, but that’s where preparation begins for a trial if it makes it that far, and a tentative trial schedule and deadlines for pre-trial motions are established.

Now here’s the rub. This lawsuit was filed within 30 days of the election. The plaintiff KNEW that Trump’s lawyers have 30 days to respond. It would be virtually impossible to submit an Answer (any Answer worth its legal salt) to the complaint in a shorter amount of time. My guess is the lawsuit probably will not last the year out, or will be dismissed shortly. However, the plot of the plaintiff’s lawyer (and likely the political enemies of Trump behind him) was to simply make the allegation, get it on record, and use it as a political straw man to attack Trump with during the remaining days of the election.

I will revisit this issue in greater detail later this week, and with links to the original complaint and current complaint. In all the years I’ve been involved in criminal and civil litigation, this is another case that smells like manure, and I sincerely hope that Team Trump asks the court for sanctions against the attorney for the plaintiff for filing a malicious lawsuit for political purposes.

____________________________________________

Please see my recent article on Why I’m Still Voting For Trump In Spite of the Trump Tapes

Dr. James A, PhD

If I have a job that is 30 miles away, having a car is not optional. My town may have only one mechanic. However, he’s a foul mouth jerk. I have no other choice but to sit through his diatribes and complain about his language, and even his sexist remarks. I explain I’m a Christian, and his language is offensive. Nevertheless, his record for fixing cars is impeccable. Nobody in town disputes that. He replies that I can take my car some where else. But, if I don’t get to work, I will lose my job and be unable to support my family.

I’m going to keep voicing my complaints about his attitude, but since he’s the only choice I have that I know can fix the car, I’m stuck. Allowing him to fix my car is not an endorsement of his behavior, but I have to weigh options against less than favorable alternatives.

This is how I feel about Donald Trump*. The recent release of an audio of him degrading women is despicable. There’s no excuse for it. It is offensive to me as a Christian, as a husband, and as a father. However, at this point, it’s Hillary or Trump, and in spite of Trump’s immoral rhetoric, he’s on the right track politically to getting America back in the right direction. Furthermore, Trump has a Godly running mate in Mike Pence, who I hope can be a good influence on Trump. Christians keep losing ground every four years, and our choices keep getting worse. Perhaps, if Trump wins, and the church does OUR job, the future candidates will give us greater options.

Liberal Logic Fail:

All immoral people should not be president

Clintons & Trump are immoral

Ergo Trump should not be president

What liberals and the Gestapo Media want from these Trump Tapes, is to make this the standard on which the election should be decided. However, the liberals ignore Bill Clinton’s track record of raping women, and Hillary Clinton intimidating them into silence and laughing about the victim of child rape she attacked on behalf of her client in 1975. To further explicate their hypocrisy, these liberals recently made a spectacle out of Trump with a naked statute placed all over the country (it was a trending topic on Twitter called #NakedTrump), which are now being sold on E-Bay as miniature figures. The double standards of the far left are astounding, and yet they expect us to drop support of Trump over an asinine comment he made 11 years ago while virtually silent on these scandals surrounding the Clinton Crime Syndicate.

Moreover, we are on the brink of an INEVITABLE nuclear war with Russia thanks to Hillary & Obama. Hillary even helped Russia get the fuel for the war. Recent email leaks have tied Hillary to using the Clinton Foundation to secure uranium for Russia (for ignorant liberals, uranium is used to make nuclear weapons).

Leaks have also exposed Hillary staff rigging the election that knocked her Democratic opponent, Bernie Sanders, out of the race: which subsequently lead to the deaths of several DNC staff. And the DNC debacle isn’t the only deadly statistic surrounding the “Clinton Body Count”.

The Clinton’s talk of supporting the black community is a joke. Hillary ridiculed the disparate sentencing schemes that she claims unduly subject blacks to harsher sentences under mandatory drug laws. Perhaps it is her failing health that provoked a bout of amnesia since it was her husband that passed the mandatory sentences for those crimes in the mid-late 1990’s. Hillary opined that blacks were “super-predators” that should be “made to heal [like a dog]”. (That preceding link is from a source very antagonistic to Donald Trump. Thus any Black Lives Matter advocates reading this have no grounds for claiming bias.). Hillary considered a Grand Wizard of the KKK , Robert Byrd, (The KKK endorses Hillary) a great man and hero, which was defended by Bill Clinton because “he was just trying to get elected”.

Hillary helped stage a coup in Honduras, overthrowing a democratically elected leader, and leading to the assassination of a political activist that opposed Hillary’s involvement. Of course, the model for Hillary’s actions are based on a Satanic socialist she calls a hero named, Saul Alinsky. In fact, Hillary’s college thesis was written on Alinsky’s “Rules For Radicals”. Is it any wonder that the terrorist group, TALIBAN, has now also endorsed Hillary?

When the Clinton’s left the White House, they reported that they were “dead broke“. Since then, they have acquired literally millions upon millions of dollars through defrauding Blacks and Latinos (see Clinton Cash) and by accepting foreign donations from terrorist countries, while keeping 96% of the profits through their various foundations.

foreign-country-donations-to-the-clinton-foundation

Wikileaks has also release a series of new documents further exposing the Clinton’s scandalous empire to mandate open borders and ignore terrorist threats.

Hillary has made this a political issue in the same manner she did with comments about a Mrs. Universe contestant. Though shortly after politicizing the issue with a “Mr. Trump, Words Matter” campaign, email leaks revealed she attempted to have the founder of Wikileaks, Julian Assange, killed by a drone strike. Keep in mind, her “words matter” slogan was to convince America that Trump shouldn’t be around nuclear codes because of a ridiculous comment he allegedly made about “Miss Piggy”, which is clearly far more dangerous than threatening to drone-strike your nemesis.

I could write more, but I’d like to post this before the election. The list is virtually endless. The Hillary campaign is an extension of the massive globalist agenda propagated by Obama (although it certainly wasn’t started by him) that is deliberately designed to bring all Americans “to heal” to the ruling elite of the world. Hillary & Obama, with the help of George Soros, are bent on destroying what’s left of Godly American values and culture, and enslaving ever color and creed in America under the umbrella of a United Nations dictatorship. And according to brainwashed liberals, we should just let them do it, because even if Trump is the only mechanic competent enough to fix the American “car”, he said some rotten words 11 years ago. I won’t excuse Trump’s comment, and neither should any of his supporters. Neither must we remain silent on issues that we are still in disagreement with him over while continuing to support his campaign. But those who think Hillary should win by default because Trump didn’t have a filter towards women 11 years ago are in dire need of a thorough brain x-ray. We are not minimizing the severity and crudeness of Trump’s comment. But good night, if Bill & Hillary can get away with murder, treason, rape, leaking classified emails, and then hiding the evidence by hiring a specialist after staff were ordered to destroy their phones with hammers why on earth SHOULD we “dump Trump”??

 

 

______________________________

*

I personally think Billy Bush saved this audio for a “rainy day”.  The video shows that the microphone belonged to him. He asked for it back when they parted on the Days of Our Lives set. It would be too risky to bribe Trump with it. So I believe he sat on it for several years and when the 2016 debates came around, opportunity knocked, and he was paid a hefty sum of money by a media outlet who knew it would be critical in the election. Again, I haven’t looked at all the facts yet, and this is my opinion, but Billy Bush is related to George Bush, who has recently supported Hillary Clinton. It was his mic, and this information has been held for 11 years, and released within one month of the election. Billy has recently been added to the Today Show. His net worth is reportedly around 9$M, but we know that’s chump-change compared to the wealth of the Clintons and Bushes. Thus knowing what the leak would do to his own reputation, the pay off would have to be worth it. But I seriously doubt liberals will expect as much from Billy Bush, as they expect from Donald Trump. None of the liberals on social media are calling on Billy to step down from any of his television engagements. Only Trump is being eviscerated. Enough said.

_______________________________

Please see my article on the LGBT Conspiracy: The Daniel Trap for why I disagree with Trump supporters who claim to be LGBT. Regardless of Trump’s success, if America does not return to our foundations, we can expect nothing but judgment. As Pastor Jeff Fugate has stated, “American will not be great again, until we are Godly again”.

Dr. James A., PhD

When the infamous DNC Leaks hit the presses, one of the first accusations made by Hillary Clinton and her henchmen (and I mean, “henchmen”, given that 4 people are now dead linked to the DNC Leaks) shouted was that Russia was involved to help rig the election for Donald Trump (even though US intelligence as well as Israeli intelligence have debunked that theory).

However, this is not new news. What IS interesting is that Hillary is being investigated over the emails on her personal server, a Russian took credit for hacking it, and Crooked Hillary immediately denounced him as a lying criminal. Revealed in the DNC Leaks is this gem:

Hillary Clinton’s team quickly shot down a claim from a Romanian hacker that he had breached her private email server while she was secretary of State. “There is absolutely no basis to believe the claims made by this criminal from his prison cell. In addition to the fact he offers no proof to support his claims, his descriptions of Secretary Clinton’s server are inaccurate. It is unfathomable that he would have gained access to her emails and not leaked them the way he did to his other victims,” the Clinton camp wrote in a statement. Romanian hacker Marcel Lehel Lazar, known as “Guccifer,” told several news outlets that he had easily hacked into her email server on more than one occasion. His hack into the email account of a close Clinton ally first brought her private email to light. Clinton has claimed throughout the investigations into her use of a private server that it was never infiltrated by foreign hackers as critics accuse her of putting confidential materials at risk. Lazar was recently extradited to the United States and is currently in prison in Alexandria, Va., facing other cybercrime charges. (Link)

So why was Team Hillary so adamant about rejecting the notion of Russian involvement over her private emails, and qualifying that “he offers no proof to support his claims”, when she immediately accused Russia without any “proof to support” such claims after the DNC Leak? Post DNC Leak, there was absolutely nothing offered by the DNC in the manner of “proof to support” their claims, it was mere speculation, yet over the personal email server, even after a confession by a hacker, the claim of Russian involvement was brushed off.

It seems Team Clinton is fond of using capricious tactics when it suits them. Given how the DNC stole the nomination from Bernie Sanders, nothing is much of a surprise when it comes to the dishonesty and underhanded scheming of Team Hillary.

 

Dr. James A., PhD

It is amazing how much leftist liberals scream out for gun control, unless of course, those guns could be used to assassinate presidential candidate, Donald Trump:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(There are DOZENS, if not HUNDREDS, of these captured by Mark Dice)

One of the Twitter users making the death threats belongs to the U.S. Army (last name, Lara)

Oss my Houston people better kill Trump while he’s there and I’m over here 😭

Dr. James A, PhD

James White of Alpha & Omega Ministries (example) and his ilk have made repeated claims that Donald Trump is evidence of the judgment of God on America for our wickedness. There’s no question our country has shown the fullness of Amorite iniquity, but this has got to be one of the most illogical statements he’s ever said for the following reasons:

1) When God gave Israel wicked leaders, it was normally in the Northern tribes where the entire population had given themselves over to wickedness and rebelled against the laws they were bound to. There is no precedent for God JUDGING the wicked with the righteous. Genesis 18:25, Psalm 18:26.

2) Did God judge America and give us Bill Clinton, and then bless us by giving us George Bush, Jr, and then judge us again by giving us Obama? What did America do better to “deserve” getting blessed between Bush Sr, only to be judged with Clinton, then blessed again with Jr, and then judged again with Obama? If Donald Trump is the judgment of God on America, how on earth do you explain Obama? If the church and country as a whole has been in a consistent downgrade, can someone please explain those intervals of conservative Republicans in between the Democrats, and what possible reason God may have had for the back and forth?

3) Hello? TRUMP ISN’T EVEN PRESIDENT!! How on earth is God using Trump to judge America when the man hasn’t even won the election? Does White know something the rest of us don’t know? Ironically, there’s more talk of judgment on America viz Trump then there is if Hillary gets elected. Someone has truly forgotten to lock the stable doors.

Probably the biggest reason for this blunder is that White and his ilk who’ve repeated this mantra do not have a Biblical eschatology, they are Amillennialists. Therefore they reject the Biblical view of the rapture, and that God will not be judging the church with the rest of the world, including any “judgment” on the United States, particularly when there are still more than 10 righteous people (Genesis 18) fighting to preserve our heritage under natural law (what some deem Jeffersonianism), and winning souls to Christ. This is just another example of the kind of warped mentality you get from the Calvinist amillennial crowd.

_______________________

I have some very serious issues with Trump. The transgender bathroom comments he made recently are very disturbing, but at this point, it’s Trump or Hillary. Here’s an interesting take on it from Geoffrey Grider ~Why a Bible Believer Is Supporting Trump and The Real Reason Why Donald Trump Was Chosen