Dr. James A., PhD
In a shark-jumping tactic to assist crooked Hillary overtake Donald Trump’s presidency, the CIA (at least as far as the mainstream media tells us) has “confirmed” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump. Infowars (1st hour, Dec 14, 2016, with Larry Nichols) reports that the CIA is actively attempting to convince the electoral college to change their vote (or at least abstain until “further investigation” can be conducted. Why “further” investigation is necessary if there was conclusive evidence is beyond me, but I digress). Ah! Remember when Democrats complained that FBI Director Comey was in violation of the “Hatch Act” for “attempting to influence the election”! Apparently, the CIA is exempt.
Donald Trump has dismissed this “Russia did it” propaganda for the conspiratorial fake news that it is. Others, such as intelligence specialist Steve Pieczenik-who claimed that the FBI was responsible for leaking the information to Wikileaks-has also harpooned the Russian shark. But the defense liberal Democrats foist upon the safety-pin generation is that the CIA has no standing in politics, and is therefore an unbiased third-party providing only intelligence that affects the national security of the country.
I beg to differ.
From the CIA’s official, verified Twitter account, behold the CIA’s agenda to promote LGBTism. I have warned about the LGBT Trojan Horse in other articles (The Daniel Trap), how it is a globalist agenda to destroy Christianity and provoke God’s wrath. I think this proves it. What on earth is an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY doing promoting political and social issues like LGBTism? The CIA claims they PUSHED the agenda for “fairness and equality in the workplace” and were instrumental in playing a key role in providing an LGBT inclusive work environment.
Therefore, the CIA is not simply an intelligence agency designed to provide the president with sensitive information for the protection of national interests, but is actively involved in politics by engaging in propaganda that shapes the moral views of the country. If the CIA has this kind of stake in ethics, then the Democrat’s and traitor Republicans can not argue that the CIA is not motivated by politics. And, if the CIA can be shown to be involved in politics, there’s no grounds to oppose objections that they may have a political motivation for claiming that Russia interfered with the election.
Furthermore, the CIA also claimed that Russia hacked the GOP and simply withheld the information. There’s three reasons why this is ludicrous.
- If the Republicans had hack-worthy dirty on Trump, they would have used it. Republicans fought Trump hard in the primaries, started Never Trump in the general, and are still trying to unseat him in the electoral college, not to mention they didn’t contribute one dime to Trump’s campaign. Russia hacking the GOP doesn’t eliminate the knowledge of what other Republicans would have already known about Trump before the “hack”. Even if Russia hacked the GOP, that wouldn’t prevent Republicans from using information against Trump they were already privy to prior to any hack.
- If the Russians gave the information to Trump to use against other Republicans, then every one of them were silent about their source. If Trump would have used any information about something gleaned from hacked emails, any Republican would’ve immediately seized on the opportunity to accuse Trump of obtaining illegally obtained classified or private information. No Republican ever accused Trump of using hacked dirt on them to win the primary election.
- During the general election, intelligence agents met with Hillary to claim that Russia may be involved in interfering with the election. However, no intelligence agents ever met with Trump. Now don’t you think Trump deserved to be briefed by intelligence agencies if the party whose ticket he is on was hacked? Or do intelligence agencies only brief Democrat candidates when the DNC is “hacked”, but leave Republicans in the dark? When only one candidate gets “briefed” that smacks of partisanship, and more likely, a Plan B because the real polls, and the thousands attending Trump rallies, were showing an inevitable Hillary loss.
Vice President-Elect, Mike Pence, is also known for his opposition to the LGBT agenda. Could it be that the CIA is afraid that Pence will be a thorn in the LGBT agenda that the CIA admitted pushed for? Or perhaps Trump’s wall will put a damper on those Fast & Furious operations and ruin those Barry Seal deals with the Mexican Cartels!
One thing is clear, the other…not so much. What is not clear-and frankly, more likely fake news-is that Russia had anything to do with the election. What is clear is that the CIA has a political motivation to make it look that way.
NOTE: Please see also our other article on the things that Russia would have had to know to even consider hacking the DNC