Dr. James A., PhD
There are several factors that don’t add up when we consider that “The Russians” “hacked” the DNC and Hillary’s private server.
First of all, of all the devices and internet depots the Russians could have thought to hack, why choose the emails of low level campaign strategists as opposed to other high level government officials? In other words, how would Russia even know that there was dirt in the DNC emails? As a former “hacktivist”, I never went on a fishing expedition without having some idea of what I was looking for. It seems obvious, and a matter of common sense, that Russia would have at least had to have had some idea of what was in those emails BEFORE hacking them to think that they in some way could have helped Trump. However, there’s no guarantee they would have even helped Trump, and not the other 17 candidates. If Trump was the intended recipient, it certainly doesn’t make sense to give the info to Wikileaks.
Secondly, if Russia was convinced that incriminating emails were among the DNC, then why not expedite the information by giving Wikileaks ONLY the incriminating documents instead of flooding Wikileaks with thousands upon thousands of emails. It was the American people who did most of the digging that found all of the incriminating information. Russia couldn’t have depending on a few Americans to simply find all the needles in the haystacks. Had Russia known for example, that Donna Brazille was feeding moderators debate questions, then why not just highlight THAT email instead of making us dig for all the dirt?
The better and more likely, explanation is that somebody already on the inside knew what was in those emails, or what could be in them, somebody like Seth Rich.
Thirdly, regarding Hillary’s private server. If Russia targeted that as well, how did they even know to look for classified information on a private server? It’s one thing to know in advance that Hillary has private emails with classified government information on GOVERNMENT servers, quite another to KNOW that she is storing them on a private server, at home [perhaps her maid was a Russian agent!].
The more plausible story is that Hillary Clinton pulled a Robert Hanssen. Hanssen was a high level CIA operative that eventually got caught selling secrets to Russia. He would sneak docs out of the CIA, then place them under a bridge and inform Russian agents of the pick up spot. In this case, Hillary’s private server acted as the “pick up” spot. In my opinion, Hillary let the Chinese, Saudi’s, et al, know she had a private server and for a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation (including agreements to pay Bill Clinton $500K a speech…IN RUSSIA), you could have access to the classified information on a private server located at IP………use port___________. Then “Oops, I got hacked”.
Democrats have also conveniently forgotten that Wikileaks was not the only source that proved corruption in the DNC. Project Veritas caught several DNC officials on video admitting to causing violence at Trump rallies and using buses to take extra voters around to polling stations to vote multiple times. Project Veritas was independent of the Wikileaks revelations, although their documentation confirmed the veracity of the Wikileaks documents.
Although Dr. Steve Pieczenik has already confirmed that it was insiders-including himself- in the US that leaked the info to Wikileaks as a counter-coup against establishment collaborators, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the leaks-not hacks-were an inside job that had nothing to do with Russia.
Please also see our article on the CIA’s LGBT Agenda for additional arguments that debunk the “Russians Also Hacked The RNC” nonsense.