Dr. James A., PhD.

I am a graduate of Calvary Christian College & Seminary (“CCCS”), a school started by Jack Van Impe and Michael Johnston (and also the alma mater of Dr. Kent Hovind). I have an EARNED PhD, preceded by a Master’s and Bachelor’s degree in theology. I also have an earned degree from law school which help start my career as a paralegal and professional investigator.  I have been an avid reader all of my life so much of what I have learned I would have learned in spite of my education in Bible college. Unfortunately, in a day where sophistry is more important than common sense, you almost have to have some kind of degree for people to take you seriously about anything. The same books you use as a college textbook are often available at a local library.

However, CCCS is not an “accredited” Christian college, and this seems to be a “problem” for many of whom I debate. “Problem” I say, because a school being either Christian or unaccredited is used by my skeptic foes as an ad hominem means to discredit my arguments. The tactic of attacking a person’s arguments based on their education goes all the way back to Jesus’ day when the enemies of Christ attempted to discredit His teaching because He didn’t graduate from a prestigious state-owned college (John 7:15). The same crowd also used this argument to discredit Christ’s disciples. (Acts 4:13). In fact, I have heard more objections to my PhD by atheists, skeptics, agnostics and liberals than objections to my actual arguments on any given topic. Ironically, most of the objectors are anonymous who themselves have no formal education. Moreover, if only the ‘educated’ can properly understand the content of a specialty, then nobody else would be able to comprehend someone like Dawkins unless they have an equal education, which begs the question as to why any atheist would attempt to use his arguments against a theist/creationist given that he must admit to his own lack of academic bereftment.

The objection always boils down to whether or not a person received their degree from an “accredited” school, or that my education is not valid because it was derived from a Christian college. Not only is this NOT a valid objection, it commits the genetic fallacy (attempting to discredit an argument solely on the grounds its source). If my degree was NOT valid, what would that have to do with the truth value of arguing that, for example, whatever begins to exist has a cause? Furthermore, the argument works both ways. The atheists I debate with engage in a special pleading fallacy by ignoring this fact. For example. The modern-day atheist champion, Richard Dawkins, does not have a degree in biology, yet his followers accept his views as a biologist as irrefutable proof that evolution is true. If atheists were consistent, they would admit that Dawkins’ opinions on biology as expert testimony would commit the fallacy of argumentum ad vericundiam (improper authority). Moreover, Dawkins also does not have a degree that majors in philosophy, and therefore would not be qualified to give an expert opinion as to why an evolutionary scientist should be honest about their findings-a philosophical matter, not a scientific one. (For more on demonstrating that evolution is far more a priori philosophical nonsense than it is science, see Phillip Johnson’s, Reason In the Balance)

Accreditation is only a recent development in our education system (1950s). Thus, if atheists were fair and consistent, they would ignore Marx, Nietzsche, Sartre, Hume, Russell, and a handful of other atheists, agnostics, and skeptics of whom all modern arguments for atheism have their nexus of whom never held “accredited” degrees. Furthermore, most of the colleges they graduated from were at the time Christian universities (Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Westminster, etc…). So if lack of accreditation and graduating from a Christian college discredits a person’s education, then all of atheism’s founding fathers should be discarded a priori before any debate relying on their premises can begin.

Accreditation is normally governed by statute. In other words, a board of people decide on what is appropriate to teach at a college, and how it should be taught, and the college receiving accreditation must comply with their regulations. Ironically, the atheist doesn’t seem to object at this point that the state dictating what any Christian college should teach in order to obtain accreditation would be a violation of the so-called ‘separation of church and state’ doctrine. The atheist is completely comfortable with maintaining this double standard, e.g., Christianity should not be supported or endorsed by government, but the government must put its stamp of approval on your Christian education or it’s not a valid degree. Of course, we know that the real motive behind the atheist arguments here is to actually get rid of theism altogether, so being exposed for a little hypocrisy is a small price to pay in achieving the greater good of the fight to completely privatize Christianity.

If accreditation was required to make all degrees valid, then no Christian university would be safe so long as the board responsible for issuing accreditation can be manipulated by personal bias against creationism, theology, Christian ethics, and the Bible. In fact, my position is that accreditation is a tool to do just that (after having read the Communist Manifesto, Humanist Manifesto, and Rules For Radicals): keep ‘religion’ out of the public school system, and indoctrinate our next generations with Marxism, marriage ‘equality’, moral relativism, and a disdain for the theistic foundations on which our country was built*. Today’s college students are often encouraged to engage in riots and protests, and even given college credit for it. They are offended by the slightest hint of disagreement that doesn’t kowtow with their violent relativism. One college professor was recently seen at a rally for President Trump hitting a Trump supporter over the head with a bike lock.

Sorry, but I’ll take my ‘non-accredited’ degree over the safety-pin standards of accredited colleges any day. Calvary Christian College & Seminary has a GRUELING work schedule. It is no diploma mill. You won’t pay for your course, and get a degree in the mail. YOU HAVE TO EARN IT. In fact, I did more writing and read more books to earn my degree at CCCS then I ever did in public school, or even law school (except for the case-law readings). A Christian college should not be subjected to state ‘accreditation’, and no Christian president of a Christian college should ever subject his college to one. It is an utterly silly argument to subject a person’s desire to be educated according to his/her beliefs to a system that dismisses those beliefs outright, and then attack that person’s arguments or opinions based on such faulty presuppositions about education.

 

For more on CCCS position on accreditation, see President Mike Johnston’s statement, here.

 

______________________________________

 

*A recent video made by Millie Weaver at Infowars shows how Marxism is being taught in college campuses across America.

 

 

Dr. James A., Ph.D.

[CORRECTION: All references to “MSNBC” should read MSM {Main Stream Media}]

I have put off writing this for some time because I’ve followed Infowars for almost 20 years and wanted to give them the benefit of a doubt. I have written some critiques about Alex Jones’ New Age Christian Syncretism, but still supported his news research. But something really shook my confidence in Jones when he committed to a 180 degree turn around on the Pizza Gate scandal, as did his guest, Mike Cernovich.

I’m not going to break down all of the details of Pizza Gate. That task has been tackled by NUMEROUS other people (including professional journalists). For the sake of brevity, I’m keeping the facts to argumentative points and will not litter this opinion with too many references because for the purposes of this article, the argument is more important.

Alex initially “apologized” for “exposing” Pizza Gate in March, 2017, which was then circulated by all the liberal media as proof that “alt right” is fake news, as even admitted by the “alt right godfather”. On April 4, 2017, Alex interviewed Mike Cernovich following his revelation about Susan Rice evidence that she played a part in unmasking Trump associates illegally. Alex reaffirmed his denouncement of Pizza Gate, to which Cernovich agreed; which is ironic because Cernovich had only recently been interviewed by 60 Minutes where he affirmed that Pizza Gate was NOT “fake news”. But now both Cernovich and Alex claim that Pizza Gate (hereinafter,”PG”) is the fabrication of the deep state to distract from security clearances being denied to potential Trump staffers.

The following are just a few points that show Alex and Mike are….FULL OF IT, and I will view everything they publish from here on out with a grain of salt.

DID ALEX JONES START PIZZA GATE?

Alex has repeatedly taken credit for either being behind PG or pushing it into the spotlight along with MSNBC, and figured out in early December 2016 that PG was a Deep State (“DS”) conspiracy to distract from “real pedophilia”.  According to Alex, the information about “code words” wrapped in pizza rhetoric was actually planted by the DS. This is ABSURD for several reasons.

PG began by others crowd-sourcing information discovered in the Podesta Email leaks provided by Wikileaks in OCTOBER of 2016. It began when I noticed something in the Podesta emails that appeared to be code words because it didn’t make any sense that someone wanted to rent a pizza for an hour, and said so on Twitter. One of my followers picked up on it, and started searching for all references related to pizza, and connected the dots on the code words. Then Brian Austin (“0 Hour”) connected the symbolism and code words from FBI files and THAT is what started the crowd sourcing on 4Chan, and Reddit that uncovered the overwhelming evidence on Comet Pizza and other pedophile networks in general, commonly now known as PizzaGate. The hashtag “#PizzaGate” was trending on Twitter, and covered by several others long before Alex caught wind of it. Alex was even being criticized for NOT covering it which makes it clear he wasn’t behind it. Furthermore, no mainstream media was covering the issue until at least 3 weeks of it being viral. Thus, MSNBC couldn’t have been behind it, either.

PLANTED CODE WORDS?

For the DS to have “planted” these code words, the DS would have had to anticipate Podesta being hacked, and planted these code words in the emails ahead of the hacks in the hopes that they would be found by someone perusing through the Wikileaks files. Not only is that an absurd assumption, but if the DS planted these code words to implicate themselves as a distraction, what would that say about all of the other bombshells found in the Podesta emails? Did the DS plant all of that, too? and we just haven’t figured out the sleight-of-hand yet?

Jones claims PG was a distraction to cover up larger pedophile issues. How it gets much bigger than high-level politicians being involved in, and financing pedophile networks is beyond me, but I digress. Mike Cernovich then provided the details as to why it was a distraction: because DS were using a swinger club in DC to frame would-be Trump staffers by drugging them, staging nude photo shoots with them and an underage girl/boy, which in turn would be used for blackmail. Now as plausible as that story is (although no evidence was provided yet for this), it ultimately comes down to  child exploitation and extortion surrounding security clearances which is quite innocuous in comparison to children being actually raped and murdered as implied in the PG scandal. If anything, Pizza Gate has drawn national attention to the problem of sex trafficking among politicians, and has focused on the powers-that-be that finance it, instead of simply busting the low-level customers and an occasional warehouse.

This begs the question: why would the DS use something as egregious as a pedophile scandal to cover up something far less ominous? Secondly, the PG story broke in October. Trump was not even elected yet. So how could the DS have used Pizza Gate as a distraction from security clearance scandals when it was not yet known whether security clearances for Trump would even need to be manipulated given that he had not even been elected president yet?

ARE THE RESEARCHERS BEHIND PIZZA GATE “INTERNET TROLLS”?

Alex also blamed the push of Pizza Gate on INTERNET TROLLS. This was probably the straw that broke the camels back on my support for Infowars-and many others. What an insult because the MAJORITY of the people investigating PG were INFO WARS SUPPORTERS. Some of these supporters actually appeared on Alex’s show (author, Britney Pettibone, Doug Hagmann, Former CIA/FBI Steve Pieczenik, et al), and apparently, his own staff, Joe Biggs, is an internet troll, as well as Mike Flynn, Jr, Joe Rogan, former Huff Post journalist, David Seamands, and let’s not forget that Mike Cernovich himself was pushing PG until his RECENT interview on Infowars. So to blame PG on “a bunch of internet trolls” is a slap in the face to the people who have loyally supported and defended Alex Jones, and even Mike Cernovich (in spite of some of his questionable history over allegedly  defending rape).

IS ALEX JONES CONTROLLED OPPOSITION?

The question I’ve always wrestled with is that if Jones exposes the false dichotomy of the Republican/Democrat system, how could he be controlled opposition? It’s pretty simple. The country has already been awakened to the false dichotomy party system and has developed a third alternative. The plan is to ALSO control the alternative. But then why would Alex expose so much corruption? Answer: because the corruption can’t be stopped anyway and it doesn’t matter because the globalists are intent on moving forward with their schemes whether you know about it or not. Satan’s plan is to get America on a collision course with God. Provoking God and the weakening of the American foundations is far more effective at implementing the demise of America than brute force communistic hostile takeover measures.

What stops corruption are people in position with a moral conscience who acknowledge the God of the Bible, and submits to God as the Bible describes Him. Alex Jones does NOT acknowledge the God of the Bible, but a New Age, humanist version of Him (Christian Syncretism), and THIS is the goal of controlled opposition: infiltrate the remaining conservatives and help distort their perception of what it truly means to be a Christian whose final authority is the Bible. The population can be ‘red pilled’ and ‘awoke’ all they want over what the globalists are planning because information is not power if it is based on half-baked truths.  God ultimately destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah for a lack of 10 righteous people. Yes, their immorality provoked him, but after Abraham interceded, God agreed to spare Sodom if Abraham could find ten righteous people. The goal of controlled opposition is to eliminate that righteous element by introducing a Laodicean type of so-called Christianity, instead of a Christianity whose view of objective moral absolutes are based on Sola Scriptura.

The devil already has the Left. They are corrupt, immoral, godless, and wicked to the bone. The right has sold out to much of the same. Now the goal is to turn the middle parties who have some semblance of Godliness left. With Infowars’ endorsement of Gay Rights, defense of pro choicers (defense of Tomi Lahren) and constant vilification of Bible believing ministries and street preachers, Infowars and their ilk have successfully redefined what it means to be conservative to the point that there’s not much of a recognizable difference anymore from the moral ideology of a Democrat from that of a modern-day conservative (or as Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars calls it, “the new punk”).

Alex accuses Bible believers of being DS plants to make him look bad. We think it’s the other way around. The bottom line to discern who the wolf is is to weigh their rhetoric and works against the teaching of Scripture. The less emphasis you put on absolute truth and Sola Scriptura, the more likely YOU are the one being deceived. Alex champions the power of the universe and the human spirit in being able to save humanity. The Bible, however, paints quite another story of the human condition: it’s corrupt, wicked, and requires a Saviour who ALONE provided the remedy. Any deviation from this Absolute Standard should make true Bible believing Christian skeptical, and proceed with caution when tuning in to Infowars.

For more on this dilemma, please see Why America May Not Survive Even If Trump Wins

 

 

Dr. James A., PhD

Dear Mr. Putin,

Rumor has it you hacked the election (not ‘actual’ hacking but Russian papers talked negatively about Hillary and influenced public opinion. So thank you for being the only news outlet on earth that gave a political candidate negative coverage in America. Yes, every major mainstream news outlet in the world criticized Trump, but that’s different-somehow). We know you can’t actually prove this to really take credit for it (neither can we), but the mainstream media repeats it everyday ad nauseum, so it must be true.

Thank you for protecting our religious rights. We know that even though most of your country is atheist, and you recently banned Christianity, you were at least concerned enough to make sure that America had the freedom to continue to send our missionaries to Russia. As you know, Democrats and the ACLU are atheists and want to keep God and Christianity out of our schools and public life, much like in Russia. But, ever since you helped elect a conservative, it will be at least 4 more years until Democrats can finish the job on religious freedom that Communists started.

Thank you for helping the United States get rid of the fuel for our nuclear weapons by buying 20% of our Uranium from/through the Clinton Foundation. That will give our EPA one less thing to complain about, and could prevent John McCain from selling it to Syria.

Thank you for paying Bill Clinton over $500,000 for speeches he made in Russia. This sets a precedent for all future Toast Master speakers that public speaking actually does pay.

Thank you for putting in a president that wants to get rid of socialized health care. Yes, we know, Obamacare was much, much closer to the kind of government entitlements we see in Socialist/Communist countries, but we know you wanted to see America prosper even if our ideas on government programs are not as centralized as they are in yours.

Thank you for helping us build our depleted military back up. We know that you have been improving your military technology and would probably like to savor your ‘victory’ over Crimea and Ukraine, but should the US ever oppose such Russian actions in the future against other sovereign nations, we at least want to thank you for giving us a fighting chance by electing a president that wants to make our military great again and be a formidable might against Russia if the need ever arises.

Thank you for showing the world that being a psychic actually works. How else could you have known that those “hacked” mails would actually get Trump elected instead of one of the other 17 Republican candidates? Also, amazing that you even knew ahead of time that there was information in emails among Democrats to think of looking there in the first place. BRILLIANT!

I am a little perturbed that you made the average citizen find all the information through crowd sourcing. I believe it would have been much easier to just give us the most incriminating emails instead of batches that we all had to sift through. I mean, if you wanted to guarantee that Trump would be president, I think it was a little risky to give all that info in bulk to Wikileaks. Fortunately, we all found the information we needed just in time to get Trump elected.

Most of all, I want to thank you for electing a president that has nothing in common with you, even though having a conservative president is far less favorable to Russia than a Democrat being in office, and is likely the most counter-productive interference in an election in world history, especially from the land of the world’s greatest chess players.

Sincerely,

Anti Communist, Anti Socialist, American Patriots for Trump,

Dr James A., PhD

Dr. James A., PhD

On March 10, 2017, AP reported that a judge in Wisconsin has blocked President Trump’s newly revised travel ban, again, under the false “Muslim Ban” moniker*. Source  Apparently, a Muslim man claims to have attempted to bring his family from Aleppo, Syria, after being granted asylum, but the process has been stalled for at least a year.

Stalled for a year.

This brings up an interesting point. Trump has only been president since January of 2017. This means that the litigant in this case was prevented from bringing his family to America under the Obama administration. SO WHY DIDN’T THE ACLU SUE OBAMA FOR A “MUSLIM BAN”??? And how is it that the GROUNDS for challenging the prevention of his family coming to the U.S. have CHANGED now that Trump is president?

This is a lawsuit of convenience where a liberal attorney cherry picked a case that he/she could convert into an argument against Trump’s vetting. It is a clear abuse of process and patently frivolous. This type of judicial activism is demeaning to our justice system.

I have a solution, however. Since it appears that the ACLU and other liberal, globalist law firms will continue to judge-shop and use the courts to attack Trump, Republicans can and should do the same thing. Fight fire with Fire. Find a case, sue Trump, and lose on purpose! Let me explain.

There are 2 rules that prevent re-litigation of a case: Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel (One prevents litigation of the same case after judgment, the other prevents attack on the same issues of a case). The attorney simply finds a litigant willing to file a lawsuit in a known conservative judge’s court (i.e., conservative judge shopping). This will result in a decision in SUPPORT of Trump’s travel ban. The effect this will have is that other district courts will not be able to cite another federal district court’s banning of Trump’s order, and will force the cases into the appellate courts and cause a split among the circuits that will have to be resolved by the Supreme Court.

Trump and his supporters need to take the gloves off. We won the election, but liberals & globalists are doing all they can to make Trump a lame-duck president. We shouldn’t let them get away with it, and it’s time to fight back as dirty as they do (minus the pedophilia).

____________________________

*DEBUNKING THE SO-CALLED MUSLIM BAN-Dr. James A

 

Dr. James A., PhD.

New Bridge Church of Lawrenceville, Georgia,  has been openly critical of the IFB churches (independent fundamental Baptists) with many of their followers constantly criticizing adherents of the Twitter #Oldpaths trend. New Bridge has a similar format and creed as that of IFB critic, Christian Farris of Next Level “ministries”. These groups of IFB critics are always quick to point out the sins of Jack Schaap and other IFB who have been charged with sex crimes, as a grounds for discrediting the entire IFB environment.

On December 28, 2016, the youth pastor of New Bridge Church, Nicholas Kelley, was arrested for child molestation.

Although their lead pastor, Jeff Lyle, denies being a Calvinist or Arminian, his defense of Calvinist doctrines is typical of the type of “neutral” pastors these days that disguise their closet-Calvinism in nuance.

So apparently, sexual abuse of children occurs among the IFB critics as well. Who knew!

Dr. James A., PhD

There are several factors that don’t add up when we consider that “The Russians” “hacked” the DNC and Hillary’s private server.

First of all, of all the devices and internet depots the Russians could have thought to hack, why choose the emails of low level campaign strategists as opposed to other high level government officials? In other words, how would Russia even know that there was dirt in the DNC emails? As a former “hacktivist”, I never went on a fishing expedition without having some idea of what I was looking for. It seems obvious, and a matter of common sense, that Russia would have at least had to have had some idea of what was in those emails BEFORE hacking them to think that they in some way could have helped Trump. However, there’s no guarantee they would have even helped Trump, and not the other 17 candidates. If Trump was the intended recipient, it certainly doesn’t make sense to give the info to Wikileaks.

Secondly, if Russia was convinced that incriminating emails were among the DNC, then why not expedite the information by giving Wikileaks ONLY the incriminating documents instead of flooding Wikileaks with thousands upon thousands of emails. It was the American people who did most of the digging that found all of the incriminating information. Russia couldn’t have depending on a few Americans to simply find all the needles in the haystacks. Had Russia known for example, that Donna Brazille was feeding moderators debate questions, then why not just highlight THAT email instead of making us dig for all the dirt?

The better and more likely, explanation is that somebody already on the inside knew what was in those emails, or what could be in them, somebody like Seth Rich.

Thirdly, regarding Hillary’s private server. If Russia targeted that as well, how did they even know to look for classified information on a private server? It’s one thing to know in advance that Hillary has private emails with classified government information on GOVERNMENT servers, quite another to KNOW that she is storing them on a private server, at home [perhaps her maid was a Russian agent!].

The more plausible story is that Hillary Clinton pulled a Robert Hanssen. Hanssen was a high level CIA operative that eventually got caught selling secrets to Russia. He would sneak docs out of the CIA, then place them under a bridge and inform Russian agents of the pick up spot. In this case, Hillary’s private server acted as the “pick up” spot. In my opinion, Hillary let the Chinese, Saudi’s, et al, know she had a private server and for a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation (including agreements to pay Bill Clinton $500K a speech…IN RUSSIA), you could have access to the classified information on a private server located at IP………use port___________. Then “Oops, I got hacked”.

Democrats have also conveniently forgotten that Wikileaks was not the only source that proved corruption in the DNC. Project Veritas caught several DNC officials on video admitting to causing violence at Trump rallies and using buses to take extra voters around to polling stations to vote multiple times. Project Veritas was independent of the Wikileaks revelations, although their documentation confirmed the veracity of the Wikileaks documents.

Although Dr. Steve Pieczenik has already confirmed that it was insiders-including himself- in the US that leaked the info to Wikileaks as a counter-coup against establishment collaborators, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the leaks-not hacks-were an inside job that had nothing to do with Russia.

**********

Please also see our article on the CIA’s LGBT Agenda for additional arguments that debunk the “Russians Also Hacked The RNC” nonsense.

Dr. James A., PhD

In a shark-jumping tactic to assist crooked Hillary overtake Donald Trump’s presidency, the CIA (at least as far as the mainstream media tells us) has “confirmed” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump. Infowars (1st hour, Dec 14, 2016, with Larry Nichols) reports that the CIA is actively attempting to convince the electoral college to change their vote (or at least abstain until “further investigation” can be conducted. Why “further” investigation is necessary if there was conclusive evidence is beyond me, but I digress). Ah! Remember when Democrats complained that FBI Director Comey was in violation of the “Hatch Act” for “attempting to influence the election”! Apparently, the CIA is exempt.

Donald Trump has dismissed this “Russia did it” propaganda for the conspiratorial fake news that it is. Others, such as intelligence specialist Steve Pieczenik-who claimed that the FBI was responsible for leaking the information to Wikileaks-has also harpooned the Russian shark. But the defense liberal Democrats foist upon the safety-pin generation is that the CIA has no standing in politics, and is therefore an unbiased third-party providing only intelligence that affects the national security of the country.

I beg to differ.

From the CIA’s official, verified Twitter account, behold the CIA’s agenda to promote LGBTism. I have warned about the LGBT Trojan Horse in other articles (The Daniel Trap), how it is a globalist agenda to destroy Christianity and provoke God’s wrath. I think this proves it. What on earth is an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY doing promoting political and social issues like LGBTism? The CIA claims they PUSHED the agenda for “fairness and equality in the workplace” and were instrumental in playing a key role in providing an LGBT inclusive work environment.

Therefore, the CIA is not simply an intelligence agency designed to provide the president with sensitive information for the protection of national interests, but is actively involved in politics by engaging in propaganda that shapes the moral views of the country. If the CIA has this kind of stake in ethics, then the Democrat’s and traitor Republicans can not argue that the CIA is not motivated by politics. And, if the CIA can be shown to be involved in politics, there’s no grounds to oppose objections that they may have a political motivation for claiming that Russia interfered with the election.

cia

Furthermore, the CIA also claimed that Russia hacked the GOP and simply withheld the information. There’s three reasons why this is ludicrous.

  1. If the Republicans had hack-worthy dirty on Trump, they would have used it. Republicans fought Trump hard in the primaries, started Never Trump in the general, and are still trying to unseat him in the electoral college, not to mention they didn’t contribute one dime to Trump’s campaign. Russia hacking the GOP doesn’t eliminate the knowledge of what other Republicans would have already known about Trump before the “hack”. Even if Russia hacked the GOP, that wouldn’t prevent Republicans from using information against Trump they were already privy to prior to any hack.
  2. If the Russians gave the information to Trump to use against other Republicans, then every one of them were silent about their source. If Trump would have used any information about something gleaned from hacked emails, any Republican would’ve immediately seized on the opportunity to accuse Trump of obtaining illegally obtained classified or private information. No Republican ever accused Trump of using hacked dirt on them to win the primary election.
  3. During the general election, intelligence agents met with Hillary to claim that Russia may be involved in interfering with the election. However, no intelligence agents ever met with Trump. Now don’t you think Trump deserved to be briefed by intelligence agencies if the party whose ticket he is on was hacked? Or do intelligence agencies only brief Democrat candidates when the DNC is “hacked”, but leave Republicans in the dark? When only one candidate gets “briefed” that smacks of partisanship, and more likely, a Plan B because the real polls, and the thousands attending Trump rallies, were showing an inevitable Hillary loss.

Vice President-Elect, Mike Pence, is also known for his opposition to the LGBT agenda. Could it be that the CIA is afraid that Pence will be a thorn in the LGBT agenda that the CIA admitted pushed for? Or perhaps Trump’s wall will put a damper on those Fast & Furious operations and ruin those Barry Seal deals with the Mexican Cartels!

One thing is clear, the other…not so much. What is not clear-and frankly, more likely fake news-is that Russia had anything to do with the election. What is clear is that the CIA has a political motivation to make it look that way.

 

NOTE: Please see also our other article on the things that Russia would have had to know to even consider hacking the DNC

Dr. James A., PhD

A recent so-called “shooter” entered Comet Pizza, where the infamous “Pizza Gate” scandal is centered, only to learn later that the suspect involved was a paid actor named Edgar Maddison Welch.

Today, MSNBC released an article from a person defending Comet Pizza. The defender, Indira Lakshmanan, is described by MSNBC as a “Comet Pizza Regular”, as if she is an ordinary, everyday average customer. It has become a common practice for me to look names up on Wikileaks and IMBD because mainstream media has become notorious for producing fake news, and sure enough, there it was: she’s a paid actor that’s not only a “regular” at Comet Pizza, but a regular of MSNBC.

indy

Dr. James A., PhD

I’m leaving the website up because myself and others have written some helpful articles. But I’m deleting my Twitter and Gab accounts. Too much drama. The Republican party is unrecognizable, and conservative has lost its meaning. I like Trump’s ideas, and his patriotism, and he has the right political ideas to actually make America great, politically. But what made America great wasn’t her sense of freedom, but her grounding in Biblical principles which spawned those concepts of freedom. Republican party adherents want the freedom, but not the Godliness that grounded it in the inherent dignity that humans have because we were made in the image of God, endowed with certain inalienable rights from our Creator.

This week, if I get to it, I’m going to write something that’s bothered me for a while, and it’s the Infowars movement, and so-called “alt right” media. Alex Jones, Breitbart, Drudge Report, et al, are all good for accurate media and honest reporting, but I’m afraid that it’s actually a tool of the devil to draw what’s left of conservatism into their web of moral relativism and religious syncretism. Being right about politics and current events is useless if you interpret the info through the wrong lenses, and it doesn’t encourage Godliness. The devil already has the ‘Left’, and now he needs to corrupt the other side, and I believe he’s using independent media to do it. Therefore, I’m retreating from certain platforms because my conscience can no longer bear engaging with those I’d have been completely separated from before the election.

Moreover, I am especially disturbed at how these independent “alt right” media have vilified sites like NowTheEndBegins.Com as if Bible believers, as Alex Jones put it, were attempting to make them look bad and are “Pharisees” because we believe that Jesus Christ is THE way, not *A* way to eternal life and Godliness, and that the only true source of knowledge about God is grounded in Scripture, not some New Age concept of “human consciousness” that tries to amalgamate some truths of Scripture with various tenants of Hinduism, Wicca, Buddhism, and Humanism. It does absolutely no good to expose globalism for what it is, while on the other hand, pushing the agenda of the antichrist. For just a small example of the New Age nonsense put out by Infowars.com see here, here, and this doozy. If you want to do further research, here’s an entire list of articles to peruse. Sorry Alex, and Infomercials, but pornography is not “art”*, and achieving some higher consciousness and discovering the secrets of the universe while occasionally giving Jesus Christ a tepid shout-out will send you to hell just as fast as worshiping Allah, Mary, and Buddha. Jesus said He is THE way, THE truth, THE life (John 14:6), and there is NONE OTHER name under heaven given to men whereby one can be saved outside of the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:12).

I won’t call Infowars and their ilk, “fake news”. Fake news is clearly produced primarily by the mainstream media. But Infowars is attracting people through actual honest reporting of events, but mixing in erroneous spiritual views that will damn this country, as well as the individuals who listen who have no discernment or grounding from Scripture. There’s more to that which I will explain later. I’m not saying avoid Infowars, et al, altogether, but view it with discernment, and know prophecy to be able to interpret events and keep them in their proper context.

I’ve given some other reasons here regarding why America may still lose even with a Trump win- Here

_________________________________

*On July 21, 2016, Alex Jones interviewed Roger Stone about the media releasing nude photos of Melania Trump, wife of president-elect Donald Trump. Jones quipped, “thank God she’s there, frankly I love her more now. European women have some really hot women, and that’s God’s creation, those photos are a work of art”. That’s not something any professing Christian would say, let alone a man faithfully committed to a wife. See Here At 8:32

Dr. James A., PhD

01f4d8a89c32954bcd3d637b2774e991_dominique_alexanderSince Donald Trump’s presidential victory on November 8, 2016, rioters have taken to the streets to protest a democratically elected president. Although the liberal media claims these are “peaceful” protests, there have been numerous death threats against Donald Trump, calls from celebrities for his assassination, signs demanding that Melania Trump be raped, and recently, an ambulance was delayed due to protesters blocking traffic resulting in the death of the father of a 4 year old girl.

The protests continued this week at First Baptist Church, home of Pastor Robert Jeffress, led by Next Generation Action activist, Dominique Alexander. Alexander has an extensive criminal record and organized the Dallas protest that led to the shooting deaths of 5 police officers. Dallas news also reports that Alexander had been implicated in causing several bodily injury to a 2 year old child.

In video footage obtained by FOX news, Alexander is heard telling supporters that First Baptist Church is the “Mother Mecca” of all racist churches. Did you catch that. The M-O-T-H-E-R  M-E-C-C-A of racist churches. For those uninformed about Islam, Mecca is considered the holiest site among Islamic adherents.

The irony of this is that Trump and his supporters have been repeatedly accused-ad nauseam-of being “Islamophobic”. Yet somehow, this usage of an Islamic “holy” site is acceptable rhetoric in attempting to vilify a Baptist church? Imagine how CNN, New York Times, Huff Post, and all the-to borrow from Michael Savage-Press Klux Klan media would have reacted if Donald Trump had stood in front of any church, and called it the “Mother Mecca” of churches. Obama, Hillary, the DNC, Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, CAIR, et al, would have all called for his resignation (and likely his head-literally).

Jeffress is an outspoken Trump supporter, and the narrative that liberal media has attempted to create (unsuccessfully) is that anyone who voted for Trump is a racist. And why is Trump racist? Because they say so (classic circular reasoning and political correctness vitriol abound among their greatest arguments). Never mind that Hillary Clinton used racial slurs (“N” word) around her chef, or the Clinton Foundation’s defrauding of millions of blacks in Haiti, or Bill Clinton, with Hillary’s acquiescence, snubbing his black son, Danney Williams, or that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Trump Riots are funded by George Soros, a known Nazi collaborator. But Robert Jeffress? Seriously? I have my disagreements with Jeffress on a few doctrinal issues, but Jeffress? a racist? Never mind that his staff is comprised of African-Americans (Jephte Fanor, Pastoral Care Associate) and Hispanics (Kevin Batista, Minister of Missions and Evangelism). This accusation is a gross defamation of a good man, and is irresponsible, reckless, callous, and hateful. But it’s what we’ve come to expect from chronic fabricators among the Left, desperate enough to create the most elaborate Stephen King style narratives necessary for their “cause”.

Furthermore, it is also obvious that Alexander is attempting to associate “hate” and “racism” against ALL churches to minimize the influence of churches throughout the country. A “guilt-by-association” tactic: if you attend a gospel preaching, Bible-believing church with a white pastor, you’re a racist. It’s worth noting that neither Alexander nor any of the Trump rioters are protesting in front of BLACK churches who voted for Trump.

It is beyond ironic that the Left has resorted to such insipid gutter-ball tactics. But the fact that the Alt-Leftists have consistently couched their ad hominem attacks in “Islamophobic” rhetoric, while at the same time freely using Islamic sites as analogies to smear churches is the height of hypocrisy…and quite racist.