Dr. James A., PhD.

New Bridge Church of Lawrenceville, Georgia,  has been openly critical of the IFB churches (independent fundamental Baptists) with many of their followers constantly criticizing adherents of the Twitter #Oldpaths trend. New Bridge has a similar format and creed as that of IFB critic, Christian Farris of Next Level “ministries”. These groups of IFB critics are always quick to point out the sins of Jack Schaap and other IFB who have been charged with sex crimes, as a grounds for discrediting the entire IFB environment.

On December 28, 2016, the youth pastor of New Bridge Church, Nicholas Kelley, was arrested for child molestation.

Although their lead pastor, Jeff Lyle, denies being a Calvinist or Arminian, his defense of Calvinist doctrines is typical of the type of “neutral” pastors these days that disguise their closet-Calvinism in nuance.

So apparently, sexual abuse of children occurs among the IFB critics as well. Who knew!

Dr. James A., PhD

There are several factors that don’t add up when we consider that “The Russians” “hacked” the DNC and Hillary’s private server.

First of all, of all the devices and internet depots the Russians could have thought to hack, why choose the emails of low level campaign strategists as opposed to other high level government officials? In other words, how would Russia even know that there was dirt in the DNC emails? As a former “hacktivist”, I never went on a fishing expedition without having some idea of what I was looking for. It seems obvious, and a matter of common sense, that Russia would have at least had to have had some idea of what was in those emails BEFORE hacking them to think that they in some way could have helped Trump. However, there’s no guarantee they would have even helped Trump, and not the other 17 candidates. If Trump was the intended recipient, it certainly doesn’t make sense to give the info to Wikileaks.

Secondly, if Russia was convinced that incriminating emails were among the DNC, then why not expedite the information by giving Wikileaks ONLY the incriminating documents instead of flooding Wikileaks with thousands upon thousands of emails. It was the American people who did most of the digging that found all of the incriminating information. Russia couldn’t have depending on a few Americans to simply find all the needles in the haystacks. Had Russia known for example, that Donna Brazille was feeding moderators debate questions, then why not just highlight THAT email instead of making us dig for all the dirt?

The better and more likely, explanation is that somebody already on the inside knew what was in those emails, or what could be in them, somebody like Seth Rich.

Thirdly, regarding Hillary’s private server. If Russia targeted that as well, how did they even know to look for classified information on a private server? It’s one thing to know in advance that Hillary has private emails with classified government information on GOVERNMENT servers, quite another to KNOW that she is storing them on a private server, at home [perhaps her maid was a Russian agent!].

The more plausible story is that Hillary Clinton pulled a Robert Hanssen. Hanssen was a high level CIA operative that eventually got caught selling secrets to Russia. He would sneak docs out of the CIA, then place them under a bridge and inform Russian agents of the pick up spot. In this case, Hillary’s private server acted as the “pick up” spot. In my opinion, Hillary let the Chinese, Saudi’s, et al, know she had a private server and for a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation (including agreements to pay Bill Clinton $500K a speech…IN RUSSIA), you could have access to the classified information on a private server located at IP………use port___________. Then “Oops, I got hacked”.

Democrats have also conveniently forgotten that Wikileaks was not the only source that proved corruption in the DNC. Project Veritas caught several DNC officials on video admitting to causing violence at Trump rallies and using buses to take extra voters around to polling stations to vote multiple times. Project Veritas was independent of the Wikileaks revelations, although their documentation confirmed the veracity of the Wikileaks documents.

Although Dr. Steve Pieczenik has already confirmed that it was insiders-including himself- in the US that leaked the info to Wikileaks as a counter-coup against establishment collaborators, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the leaks-not hacks-were an inside job that had nothing to do with Russia.

**********

Please also see our article on the CIA’s LGBT Agenda for additional arguments that debunk the “Russians Also Hacked The RNC” nonsense.

Dr. James A., PhD

In a shark-jumping tactic to assist crooked Hillary overtake Donald Trump’s presidency, the CIA (at least as far as the mainstream media tells us) has “confirmed” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump. Infowars (1st hour, Dec 14, 2016, with Larry Nichols) reports that the CIA is actively attempting to convince the electoral college to change their vote (or at least abstain until “further investigation” can be conducted. Why “further” investigation is necessary if there was conclusive evidence is beyond me, but I digress). Ah! Remember when Democrats complained that FBI Director Comey was in violation of the “Hatch Act” for “attempting to influence the election”! Apparently, the CIA is exempt.

Donald Trump has dismissed this “Russia did it” propaganda for the conspiratorial fake news that it is. Others, such as intelligence specialist Steve Pieczenik-who claimed that the FBI was responsible for leaking the information to Wikileaks-has also harpooned the Russian shark. But the defense liberal Democrats foist upon the safety-pin generation is that the CIA has no standing in politics, and is therefore an unbiased third-party providing only intelligence that affects the national security of the country.

I beg to differ.

From the CIA’s official, verified Twitter account, behold the CIA’s agenda to promote LGBTism. I have warned about the LGBT Trojan Horse in other articles (The Daniel Trap), how it is a globalist agenda to destroy Christianity and provoke God’s wrath. I think this proves it. What on earth is an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY doing promoting political and social issues like LGBTism? The CIA claims they PUSHED the agenda for “fairness and equality in the workplace” and were instrumental in playing a key role in providing an LGBT inclusive work environment.

Therefore, the CIA is not simply an intelligence agency designed to provide the president with sensitive information for the protection of national interests, but is actively involved in politics by engaging in propaganda that shapes the moral views of the country. If the CIA has this kind of stake in ethics, then the Democrat’s and traitor Republicans can not argue that the CIA is not motivated by politics. And, if the CIA can be shown to be involved in politics, there’s no grounds to oppose objections that they may have a political motivation for claiming that Russia interfered with the election.

cia

Furthermore, the CIA also claimed that Russia hacked the GOP and simply withheld the information. There’s three reasons why this is ludicrous.

  1. If the Republicans had hack-worthy dirty on Trump, they would have used it. Republicans fought Trump hard in the primaries, started Never Trump in the general, and are still trying to unseat him in the electoral college, not to mention they didn’t contribute one dime to Trump’s campaign. Russia hacking the GOP doesn’t eliminate the knowledge of what other Republicans would have already known about Trump before the “hack”. Even if Russia hacked the GOP, that wouldn’t prevent Republicans from using information against Trump they were already privy to prior to any hack.
  2. If the Russians gave the information to Trump to use against other Republicans, then every one of them were silent about their source. If Trump would have used any information about something gleaned from hacked emails, any Republican would’ve immediately seized on the opportunity to accuse Trump of obtaining illegally obtained classified or private information. No Republican ever accused Trump of using hacked dirt on them to win the primary election.
  3. During the general election, intelligence agents met with Hillary to claim that Russia may be involved in interfering with the election. However, no intelligence agents ever met with Trump. Now don’t you think Trump deserved to be briefed by intelligence agencies if the party whose ticket he is on was hacked? Or do intelligence agencies only brief Democrat candidates when the DNC is “hacked”, but leave Republicans in the dark? When only one candidate gets “briefed” that smacks of partisanship, and more likely, a Plan B because the real polls, and the thousands attending Trump rallies, were showing an inevitable Hillary loss.

Vice President-Elect, Mike Pence, is also known for his opposition to the LGBT agenda. Could it be that the CIA is afraid that Pence will be a thorn in the LGBT agenda that the CIA admitted pushed for? Or perhaps Trump’s wall will put a damper on those Fast & Furious operations and ruin those Barry Seal deals with the Mexican Cartels!

One thing is clear, the other…not so much. What is not clear-and frankly, more likely fake news-is that Russia had anything to do with the election. What is clear is that the CIA has a political motivation to make it look that way.

 

NOTE: Please see also our other article on the things that Russia would have had to know to even consider hacking the DNC

Dr. James A., PhD

A recent so-called “shooter” entered Comet Pizza, where the infamous “Pizza Gate” scandal is centered, only to learn later that the suspect involved was a paid actor named Edgar Maddison Welch.

Today, MSNBC released an article from a person defending Comet Pizza. The defender, Indira Lakshmanan, is described by MSNBC as a “Comet Pizza Regular”, as if she is an ordinary, everyday average customer. It has become a common practice for me to look names up on Wikileaks and IMBD because mainstream media has become notorious for producing fake news, and sure enough, there it was: she’s a paid actor that’s not only a “regular” at Comet Pizza, but a regular of MSNBC.

indy

Dr. James A., PhD

I’m leaving the website up because myself and others have written some helpful articles. But I’m deleting my Twitter and Gab accounts. Too much drama. The Republican party is unrecognizable, and conservative has lost its meaning. I like Trump’s ideas, and his patriotism, and he has the right political ideas to actually make America great, politically. But what made America great wasn’t her sense of freedom, but her grounding in Biblical principles which spawned those concepts of freedom. Republican party adherents want the freedom, but not the Godliness that grounded it in the inherent dignity that humans have because we were made in the image of God, endowed with certain inalienable rights from our Creator.

This week, if I get to it, I’m going to write something that’s bothered me for a while, and it’s the Infowars movement, and so-called “alt right” media. Alex Jones, Breitbart, Drudge Report, et al, are all good for accurate media and honest reporting, but I’m afraid that it’s actually a tool of the devil to draw what’s left of conservatism into their web of moral relativism and religious syncretism. Being right about politics and current events is useless if you interpret the info through the wrong lenses, and it doesn’t encourage Godliness. The devil already has the ‘Left’, and now he needs to corrupt the other side, and I believe he’s using independent media to do it. Therefore, I’m retreating from certain platforms because my conscience can no longer bear engaging with those I’d have been completely separated from before the election.

Moreover, I am especially disturbed at how these independent “alt right” media have vilified sites like NowTheEndBegins.Com as if Bible believers, as Alex Jones put it, were attempting to make them look bad and are “Pharisees” because we believe that Jesus Christ is THE way, not *A* way to eternal life and Godliness, and that the only true source of knowledge about God is grounded in Scripture, not some New Age concept of “human consciousness” that tries to amalgamate some truths of Scripture with various tenants of Hinduism, Wicca, Buddhism, and Humanism. It does absolutely no good to expose globalism for what it is, while on the other hand, pushing the agenda of the antichrist. For just a small example of the New Age nonsense put out by Infowars.com see here, here, and this doozy. If you want to do further research, here’s an entire list of articles to peruse. Sorry Alex, and Infomercials, but pornography is not “art”*, and achieving some higher consciousness and discovering the secrets of the universe while occasionally giving Jesus Christ a tepid shout-out will send you to hell just as fast as worshiping Allah, Mary, and Buddha. Jesus said He is THE way, THE truth, THE life (John 14:6), and there is NONE OTHER name under heaven given to men whereby one can be saved outside of the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:12).

I won’t call Infowars and their ilk, “fake news”. Fake news is clearly produced primarily by the mainstream media. But Infowars is attracting people through actual honest reporting of events, but mixing in erroneous spiritual views that will damn this country, as well as the individuals who listen who have no discernment or grounding from Scripture. There’s more to that which I will explain later. I’m not saying avoid Infowars, et al, altogether, but view it with discernment, and know prophecy to be able to interpret events and keep them in their proper context.

I’ve given some other reasons here regarding why America may still lose even with a Trump win- Here

_________________________________

*On July 21, 2016, Alex Jones interviewed Roger Stone about the media releasing nude photos of Melania Trump, wife of president-elect Donald Trump. Jones quipped, “thank God she’s there, frankly I love her more now. European women have some really hot women, and that’s God’s creation, those photos are a work of art”. That’s not something any professing Christian would say, let alone a man faithfully committed to a wife. See Here At 8:32

Dr. James A., PhD

01f4d8a89c32954bcd3d637b2774e991_dominique_alexanderSince Donald Trump’s presidential victory on November 8, 2016, rioters have taken to the streets to protest a democratically elected president. Although the liberal media claims these are “peaceful” protests, there have been numerous death threats against Donald Trump, calls from celebrities for his assassination, signs demanding that Melania Trump be raped, and recently, an ambulance was delayed due to protesters blocking traffic resulting in the death of the father of a 4 year old girl.

The protests continued this week at First Baptist Church, home of Pastor Robert Jeffress, led by Next Generation Action activist, Dominique Alexander. Alexander has an extensive criminal record and organized the Dallas protest that led to the shooting deaths of 5 police officers. Dallas news also reports that Alexander had been implicated in causing several bodily injury to a 2 year old child.

In video footage obtained by FOX news, Alexander is heard telling supporters that First Baptist Church is the “Mother Mecca” of all racist churches. Did you catch that. The M-O-T-H-E-R  M-E-C-C-A of racist churches. For those uninformed about Islam, Mecca is considered the holiest site among Islamic adherents.

The irony of this is that Trump and his supporters have been repeatedly accused-ad nauseam-of being “Islamophobic”. Yet somehow, this usage of an Islamic “holy” site is acceptable rhetoric in attempting to vilify a Baptist church? Imagine how CNN, New York Times, Huff Post, and all the-to borrow from Michael Savage-Press Klux Klan media would have reacted if Donald Trump had stood in front of any church, and called it the “Mother Mecca” of churches. Obama, Hillary, the DNC, Southern Poverty Law Center, the NAACP, CAIR, et al, would have all called for his resignation (and likely his head-literally).

Jeffress is an outspoken Trump supporter, and the narrative that liberal media has attempted to create (unsuccessfully) is that anyone who voted for Trump is a racist. And why is Trump racist? Because they say so (classic circular reasoning and political correctness vitriol abound among their greatest arguments). Never mind that Hillary Clinton used racial slurs (“N” word) around her chef, or the Clinton Foundation’s defrauding of millions of blacks in Haiti, or Bill Clinton, with Hillary’s acquiescence, snubbing his black son, Danney Williams, or that Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Trump Riots are funded by George Soros, a known Nazi collaborator. But Robert Jeffress? Seriously? I have my disagreements with Jeffress on a few doctrinal issues, but Jeffress? a racist? Never mind that his staff is comprised of African-Americans (Jephte Fanor, Pastoral Care Associate) and Hispanics (Kevin Batista, Minister of Missions and Evangelism). This accusation is a gross defamation of a good man, and is irresponsible, reckless, callous, and hateful. But it’s what we’ve come to expect from chronic fabricators among the Left, desperate enough to create the most elaborate Stephen King style narratives necessary for their “cause”.

Furthermore, it is also obvious that Alexander is attempting to associate “hate” and “racism” against ALL churches to minimize the influence of churches throughout the country. A “guilt-by-association” tactic: if you attend a gospel preaching, Bible-believing church with a white pastor, you’re a racist. It’s worth noting that neither Alexander nor any of the Trump rioters are protesting in front of BLACK churches who voted for Trump.

It is beyond ironic that the Left has resorted to such insipid gutter-ball tactics. But the fact that the Alt-Leftists have consistently couched their ad hominem attacks in “Islamophobic” rhetoric, while at the same time freely using Islamic sites as analogies to smear churches is the height of hypocrisy…and quite racist.

Dr. James A., PhD, Paralegal

NOTE: THIS IS THE ROUGH DRAFT (Without conclusion or closing statements) OF MY PETITION TO THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE: PLEASE SUBMIT SUGGESTIONS, COMMENTS AS I WILL BE EDITING AND SUBMITTING THIS BY NOVEMBER 14, 2016. (Spelling & Grammar check has not been done yet for the Grammar Nazi’s on the Left, whose comments will be ignored and labeled spam)

 

Democrats are petitioning the Electoral College Commission to disregard the Electoral Vote that made Donald Trump President-Elect. Their grounds are based on false charges against the lawfully elected president. Most of these false charges were discovered through Wikileaks revelations where Democrat strategists conspired to accuse Trump of racism, sexism, homophobia, and xenophobia (not to mention that they also conspired against Democrat Nominee, Bernie Sanders).

The United States of America is a REPUBLIC, and as such, the Electoral College has been defended by the Supreme Court of the United States (Ray v. Blair, 343 U.S. 214 [1951])and is based on a CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT (US Const Amend XII).  Petitions that have been submitted by Hillary Clinton supporters are based solely on emotional reasons: i.e., they didn’t like the result, yet no distinct challenges have been raised against the constitutionality of the Electoral College process. Even if such challenges were raised, it would be fundamentally unfair to visit such issues AFTER a presidential election has already been decided. This is not the first election decided by Electoral College, a process known to Democrats prior to the election. Democrats can not simply offer a challenge now to the results of the election when they failed to raise the issue prior to the election.

The reasons that Trump should remain President-Elect are as follows:

1. The Electorate provides a fair balance against corruption. For example. During this campaign, President Obama encourage illegal aliens to vote to become citizens. ICE agents arrested numerous illegal aliens who rebutted their arrests by claiming that Obama promised they would become citizens if they voted. This caused an influx of votes likely not caught by thousands of illegal aliens who had no right to vote.

Furthermore, the majority of cities wherein Hillary Clinton has derived her popular vote are within large cities with millions of citizens, such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Miami, Boston, Ann Arbor, etc…all of which traditionally vote Democrat (and DID vote Democrat in the current election). By analogy, if one city in California had 50 million Democrats, while the rest of the country had 49 million Republicans, this would have the effect of the entire country’s fate being dictated by a single geographical location. This is one of the reasons why the Electoral College was implemented in the first place. Moreover, it is well known that certain cities (like Chicago) have been gerrymandered to include a larger portion of known Democratic supporters.

2. When Hillary Clinton conceded the election, she in fact did NOT have the popular vote. The additional votes she gained came several hours after she conceded the election, and ALL of them were coming from “Blue” counties that were still at 76% -95% of a complete vote count.

3. Evidence of election fraud attempts were found all over the country, particularly in Philadelphia where voting machines were converting votes for Donald Trump/Mike Pence into votes for Hillary Clinton. Moreover, Hillary Clinton was known to have met in private with the Elections Director of the Broward County Polling Division in Broward County, Florida, just weeks before the election.

4. Project Veritas uncovered even more evidence of election fraud, capturing on video Democrats inciting riots at Trump rallies, staging false accusations, and bragging about “bussing” in repeat voters in multiple districts.

5. During the debates for presidency, Wikileaks uncovered numerous occasions where Democratic members leaked debate questions to debate moderators (i.e., Donna Brazile) giving Hillary Clinton an unfair advantage in debates that helped shape public opinion on who the better candidate was for the presidency.

Based on the foregoing factors, there is no way to determine honestly and accurately whether or not votes for Hillary were legally submitted and acquired.

 Hillary Clinton should have never been permitted to run for president.

6. Hillary Clinton was the first presidential candidate be under FBI investigation for corruption: TWICE. Hillary Clinton deleted several thousand emails AFTER receiving an order from Congress to produce emails containing classified information on a private server.

7. The Clinton Foundation is still under FBI investigation. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/06/fbi-still-investigating-clinton-foundation/

8. The Clinton Foundation has been determined through investigations to have defrauded the people of Haiti by promising funds to restore their country through charity (see Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer).

9. Recent evidence has also uncovered potential involvement by Democrats in a large pedophile ring. (See Pizza Gate, https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/2016/11/07/first-blog-post/ )

10. Hillary Clinton has claimed be the champion of women’s rights, but there is documented evidence that she intimidated and threatened sex abuse victims of Bill Clinton (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/14/hillary-clinton-haunted-by-efforts-to-destroy-bill/, and http://www.dailywire.com/news/9585/9-times-hillary-clinton-threatened-smeared-or-amanda-prestigiacomo ). Furthermore, there are victims that have claimed that Hillary herself had raped them (Cathy O’Brien, Personal Testimony, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pzp6VR7zJ8)

11. Hillary Clinton assisted in the overthrow of a democratically elected president in Honduras which led to the assassination of an activist, Berta Caceres, who was outspoken against Hillary Clinton’s involvement in the coup. http://www.democracynow.org/2016/3/11/before_her_assassination_berta_caceres_singled

Dr. James A., PhD

A new “victim” has come out against Trump just after the release of a new batch of Wikileaks, and Trump’s “Gettysburg” speech. Jessica Drake, who is an “adult”* film actress for Wicked Pictures has accused Trump of unwanted advances, and that Trump offered to pay her $10,000 for a night out. Other allegations against Trump have been quickly debunked, but it likely won’t stop the Clinton Empire from inventing new straw-women, and this new allegation is no different.

The company that Jessica Drake works for already had a vendetta against Trump. In an online magazine called Red Schtik, Wicked Pictures, et al, had declared in an article titled, Adult Film Executives Endorse Donald Trump for President, an intent to endorse Trump for president: but not because they like or respect him. According to these porn moguls, parody pornography is in large demand, and the porn industries wanted to produce x-rated versions of SNL type parody films of Trump because it would garner more viewers and hence, more profit for their sleazy empire.

Among the many utterly disgusting opinions Drake’s employer spewed about Trump, was this beauty:

“There’s his ridiculously hot daughter he not-so-secretly wants to bang. Who wouldn’t want to see a threesome with Ivanka, her dad, and Melania? I’m getting hard just brainstorming here. Make America hard again! Vote Trump!”

If I were Trump, I would have sued this magazine over this trash alone. But is it any coincidence that the Clinton Campaign, who’s already been caught ON TAPE paying agitators to cause violence at Trump rallies, and paid child actresses to ask her rigged questions at rallies, produces another “victim” one month after this article comes out? And frankly, any lewd corporation that fantasizes about filming a father, mother, and daughter together  having a sexual orgy and then has the audacity to use one of their actresses to play another victim to distract from Wikileaks, Dinesh D’Souza’s “Hillary’s America”, Breitbart’s “Clinton Cash”, and Project Veritas is the ultimate gutter scum of the earth.

Bill Clinton is a rapist and Hillary helped cover for him by threatening and intimidating them. The Clintons also had the mother of the black son of Bill Clinton, Danney Williams, thrown out of a 2 story window in an attempt to silence her from exposing Bill Clinton as Danney Williams’ father. The Hitler influenced media gives that as much air time as a mafia drowning victim. But a pornography guru that just one month ago showed disdain for Trump and his family produces an “actress” to play a new role in the Next Fake Trump Victim saga, and the American Völkischer Beobachter are all over it. Furthermore, if the Clinton Gestapo would stage fake sex adds against Trump, it’s not hard to fathom that creating fake victims would be on the ballot.

Ironically, it seems all of these women have had some demonstrable connection to the Clintons with only one or two degrees of separation. But we do want to thank these women for their bravery and courage, for standing up for the rights of all women everywhere in a timely manner promptly after every new Wikileaks release, and all uniting together within one month of the election. Hillary’s campaign is criminal and hemorrhaging badly. She needs the “women vote” to even begin to have any chance of beating Trump. These latest crass tactics are designed to accomplish just that. What a disgusting election.

 

_________________________________________

*”Adult film” means someone who gets paid to have sex with others on film. We used to call that prostitution, but now liberals call it “art”.

Dr. James A., PhD

The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.” Psalm 9:17

Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people” Proverbs 14:34

Certainly censorship has been on full display by Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, You Tube, and in the comment sections of major media online papers. Wikileaks have proven that there has been a massive collusion between liberals and mainstream media to skew facts and invent stories to discredit conservatives. In this article, I’m also going to show the other side of my support for Trump, the other side that has reservations and reluctantly supports his candidacy while abhorring his lewd statements. (I recently wrote why I still reluctantly support Trump, and this article explains the reluctant part.)

Though censorship and shadow-banning is apparent, the elite globalists fear one group far more than Alex Jones and Infowars, Breitbart, Drudge Report, Roger Stone, and The Daily Caller: fundamentalist Christians. Sure, alternative media sources like Jones are far ahead of the curve in reporting accurate news and exposing facts behind the globalist agenda. Nevertheless, if these media outlets continue supporting other elements of the globalist agenda, all of their efforts are meaningless if they fall away from the One person that matters most: God.

The reason that America is in the terrible shape that it’s in has as much to do with apathy and moral relativism as it does with leftist corruption (and the collusion with a corrupt Republican establishment that has become every bit as corrupt as Democrats). Roger Stone and Alex Jones commented on the Melania Trump attacks that her Playboy photos were “art”. Infowars has had articles that vilify street preaching Christians while giving mixed messages about his own Christianity. Virtually all of the alternate media is in favor of “gay rights” and “marriage equality”. In fact, “Milo”, who dubs himself, “the dangerous faggot”, has become a popular face of right-wing conservativism. And as much as I support the Trump campaign, and the political values of making America great again, America must face its defiance to the absolute objective moral standard that God has established that governs nations and individuals or it is wholly irrelevant how well Donald Trump and Mike Pence put our country back on track politically.

This is why the globalist controlled media is far more concerned about silencing fundamentalist Christians. Fundamentalist Christians are the most vocal about the issues that truly matter the most, and they must be silenced. George Soros has been funding “Christian” philosopher, David Gushie, for a decade now to infiltrate mainstream evangelicals with “gay rights” because it is an attack on the traditional and Biblical values of the Christian church. Globalists have infiltrated Liberty University, known for Jerry Falwell’s “Moral Majority” which once led an extraordinary visible charge against the political liberalism of America (though I have many objections doctrinally with Liberty U). Globalists know that if you want to attack American values, you have to start by attacking their belief in objective morals and their grasp of absolute truth that is grounded in the Creator. The more that globalists chip away at the foundations of truth, the further away America gets from God. Eventually, America attempts to maintain its core politics in a humanistic effort that excludes the nexus on which they are based. In other words, America wants the fruit of what made her great without having to submit to an absolute moral authority. It wants to be great without God: and those who claim that they ARE God-fearing people, want to define God outside of the Bible.

I’ve discussed this issue at length in The LGBT Conspiracy and the Daniel Trap as to why the globalists need to attack Christians to get America to emerge into a United Nations, One/New World Order. This is why the globalists are not overly concerned with what Alex Jones or Matt Drudge says, because ultimately, if a nation doesn’t have the blessings of the Almighty Creator on it, does it really matter how right these alternate media sources are about corruption and even the New World Globalists? I have a lot of respect for Alex, Drudge, Breitbart, and listen to them virtually every day. There’s no question that their track record for exposing corruption is dead on. But there’s another side of the issue being ignored by most conservatives now and that’s that there is a way that seems right to man, a way to pursue an ends according to his own eyes, and it’s deadly (Proverbs 14:12, 16:25).

We just may win the election with Trump. But I promise, we will not prosper if America does not repent of its rampant immorality and moral relativism*, and its cowardice in failing to stand up for the authority of the Bible, the creation of the universe, the rights of the unborn and the traditional marriage between one man and one woman. I think many of the terrorist attacks are a wake up call that God is prepared to give America over to her enemies, and give her the absolute autonomous freedom without Him that she wants.

The globalists are well aware of this dynamic because they are governed by an evil strategist that has been plotting man’s destruction from day one. The Never Trump evangelicals certainly have a point about many of Trump’s trysts and immoral behavior. I think they are dead wrong about the political implications, but some of the points they have raised can’t be ignored. God didn’t ignore Sodom and Gomorrah, and if America wants to have a national revival, we had better keep that in mind.

Politics may change the surface issues, but only a change of heart will resolve the sinfulness that is behind every evil thought, motive, word and action. And that change of heart can only come through the gospel of the cross of Christ. If you don’t know where you stand with God, please take the time to make sure. And if you are a Christian, this may be your last chance to have the freedom to tell your neighbors about the love that Christ has for them. Eventually, this world IS coming to a close, and we may just be witnessing the inevitable climax of history. But for now, we still enjoy some of those liberties that allow us to proclaim the cross, albeit with an increasing opposition from institutions governed by globalism. If you are a Christian, then don’t hide your treasure in the dirt. Invest in it by learning to defend your faith, and sharing it with as many as you can.

___________________________________

*For one of the most powerful refutations of moral relativism, please take the time to watch: Relativism: Feet Planted Firmly In Mid-Air . I also recommend the book of the same title.

Dr. James A., PhD, Paralegal

Liberals are doing everything they can to stop Trump. Recently, a lawsuit was conveniently refiled from another jurisdiction outside of New York state by an anonymous person claiming Trump raped “her” at a party hosted by Jeff Epstein, a convicted sex offender. Ironically, the liberal media never mentioned that Bill has been a frequent guest of Epstein. Trump had once been to a single event  hosted by Epstein in Florida (not even the state where the allege rape “occurred”), and immediately left and never attended another one.

However, the media is planning on utilizing this lawsuit in a manner of what philosophy dubs a “straw man” fallacy. The straw man fallacy is where your opponent creates a false caricature of you as if it’s your belief, action, or statement, and then attacks the caricature as if the straw man is really you, and claims victory for successfully attacking it. This is what this lawsuit is. I’m going to explain some legal proceedings that shed a little more light on this as well to further prove my point because most of the time, the public is in abject ignorance about how court systems work (which is one reason why we have so many riots against police).

First, the lawsuit was initially filed in another state and dismissed. It has been refiled in New York which does not have jurisdiction over the case. One has to wonder why a judge would even permit it to be refiled in another state. But of course, New York has already proven that its political figures will attack Trump (NY Attorney General, for example). Furthermore, the statute of limitations for this case has been exceeded by several years. I am surprised the judge even allowed it to be filed, but sometimes, the court doesn’t catch that right away until another party raises the issue. Most people think a judge reads every complaint, and that’s just not true. Most of them are skimmed over and filed by clerks or other judicial assistants. In fact, many attorneys can simply take a document to court and use the clerks electronic stamping machine and have the clerk open a docket file for it. And there you have it, Trump raped someone because a lawyer drafted a complaint and stamped a docket number on it.

Secondly, the case was dismissed for failing to state an actionable claim. Liberals are claiming that it was dismissed on a “technicality” which is highly unlikely. When a pro se lawsuit is filed, judges are bound to “construe liberally” the plaintiffs lawsuit (Haines v Kerner, 404 US 519 (1972)). In other words, because a pro se litigant often lacks the legal expertise, the judge does not hold a pro se plaintiff to the same standards. This means it is more likely that the case was dismissed on more than just “technical” grounds. Perhaps alleging that the event occurred in an abandoned house was part of the problem.

Thirdly, many people are not aware of how a lawsuit actually works. When a lawsuit is filed, after it is reviewed, it goes through the “pleadings stage”. The case does not normally get dismissed sua sponte (on the courts own initiative) when a lawyer files the case as opposed to pro se cases where the judge normally rules under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that the case has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Most of these cases survive the initial pleading stages when just the minimal requirements of pleadings are met. That’s NOT a big deal. It’s how the system works.

Where most cases get the boot, is when the defendant in a case files to summarily dismiss the case by filing a motion for summary judgment (FRCP 56) or motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12 ( (b) or (c)). But first, we need to explain the difference between matters of fact, and matters of law. A matter of fact is something that a jury decides. A matter of law is what a judge decides. A matter of law would be something like whether or not the state has a provision that makes an action a crime. For example, if I sue you for having blue hair, it would be failure to state a claim because there’s no legal provision that prohibits that (not to mention that it would be patently frivolous). However, if there were one, then there’s the question of whether the person accused actually had blue hair, which would be a matter of fact. If the facts are disputed, then any material facts in dispute must be heard by a jury. This doesn’t mean that the facts are true, it just means that any fact that is relevant to proving a particular element of a legal allegation must be heard by a jury if there is a disagreement among the parties about the facts (some of those factual contentions are minimized even further toward trial preparations as the Rules of Evidence have additional requirements for evidentiary standards of documents and witnesses).

Sometimes factual denials and admissions are done at the pleading stage. The court usually gives the defendant 30 days to file an “Answer” once the lawsuit is served by a service process (either by a process server or sheriff). In that Answer, the defendant will categorically admit or deny the numbered paragraphs in the complaint. Any facts not disputed are normally deemed admitted. Some facts also are materialized through the “discovery” process which uses written interrogatories, production of documents, and depositions.

Once all of these stages are completed, the judge orders pretrial proceedings. Time does not permit me to get into the details about that, but that’s where preparation begins for a trial if it makes it that far, and a tentative trial schedule and deadlines for pre-trial motions are established.

Now here’s the rub. This lawsuit was filed within 30 days of the election. The plaintiff KNEW that Trump’s lawyers have 30 days to respond. It would be virtually impossible to submit an Answer (any Answer worth its legal salt) to the complaint in a shorter amount of time. My guess is the lawsuit probably will not last the year out, or will be dismissed shortly. However, the plot of the plaintiff’s lawyer (and likely the political enemies of Trump behind him) was to simply make the allegation, get it on record, and use it as a political straw man to attack Trump with during the remaining days of the election.

I will revisit this issue in greater detail later this week, and with links to the original complaint and current complaint. In all the years I’ve been involved in criminal and civil litigation, this is another case that smells like manure, and I sincerely hope that Team Trump asks the court for sanctions against the attorney for the plaintiff for filing a malicious lawsuit for political purposes.

____________________________________________

Please see my recent article on Why I’m Still Voting For Trump In Spite of the Trump Tapes