Our KJV DEFENSE SITES
OUR WEBSITE
Dr. Sam Gipp
Brandon Staggs AV1611.COM
Boaz Baptist| בועז מטביל
Genesis Evidence Ministry
Pure Bible Forum
James A., Ph.D
Twitter has, for the umpteenth time, suspended my account…AGAIN. This time, in “lockstep” with all the other people telling the truth about the COVID scams. It’s ironic that of all the hundreds of tweets I’ve made about the COVID scams, it’s the one criticizing Trump that I get suspended for. Go figure.
By James A., PhD
What is controlled opposition? Lenin said, “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it”. Controlled opposition is when a third party controls the resistance of people rising against the status quo of the current parties in power. America has been dominated by a two-party system, both of who are on the same side. In fact, there’s a standing joke among Harvard Skull & Bones members about who will volunteer to be a Republican, and who wants to be a Democrat. With the rise of independent media, more patriots were waking up to the false dichotomy system of Republican Democrat, and started to rebel. The awakening among conservative Republicans probably began when George Bush, Sr gave his “New World Order” speech in 1990.
Let me explain why the Democrat vs Republican duopoly is so effective in controlling the masses before I explain why I believe Trump is controlled opposition. It’s easier to control a large group of people if you keep them divided and get them to fight among themselves. That way, they turn on each other, and not the government. The Deep State did that with blacks. When it was obvious that blacks would no longer tolerate being enslaved, Democrats with the help of Republicans that brought Nazis to America, created a plan called COINTELPRO that created a religious gang rivalry among blacks in Chicago. First, they pumped drugs into Chicago neighborhoods that would be controlled by a new face of Black Panther resistance called VICE LORDS. Vice Lords are ISLAMIC. After the VL was established, the CIA created a rivalry by giving drugs to Larry Hoover who founded the Black Gangster Disciples. The BGD are “Hebrew Israelites” or in other words, JEWISH. Can you see where the conflict arises! The Deep State created a rivalry that most of the current gang members haven’t even thought of, and to this day, those gangs still kill each other.
Every 4 years, when a Democrat is control of the presidency, there’s a Republican majority in the House or Senate. Liberals relax. Conservatives rage. Four years later, a Republican takes office, Democrats get the House and Senate, the liberals rage, and the conservatives relax. This relaxation every 4-8 years is based on HOPE. If you don’t like the current political atmosphere, JUST WAIT 4 YEARS and vote them out. As long as people have HOPE, THEY DON’T REVOLT.
HOWEVER, once people catch on to the fact that the two party system is rigged, and they’re both really on the same side, a middle opposition begins to rise that threatens the establishment. The Tea Party was a temporary answer to that, but Glenn Beck was no more a real conservative than the Bush Empire. The Deep State knew that something needed to be done to prevent an angry, patriotic middle party from rising up, gaining momentum, and possibly engaging in a 1776 part 2 style revolution. It’s that middle party that owns all the guns, after all. So how do you accomplish this? By getting someone who speaks out against the corruption of the Shadow Government, and promises to make America great again. Someone who attended the exact same Jesuit school as John Brennan: Fordham (even wonder why Trump’s SCOTUS appointees were ALL CATHOLIC, 2 of them, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, are both Jesuits as well. Trump’s wife is Roman Catholic and Trump praised Pope John Paul II at the anniversary of his death).
Trump was used to not only control the rising middle opposition, but was so obnoxious that defending him discredited many Christians. Try witnessing to someone who finds out you voted for Trump these days. You won’t get passed Romans 3:23. But after all, WHO ELSE was there that talked about defending capitalist and American values? Sure, he was a whoremonger, adulterer, foul mouthed, but he made the country prosper, didn’t he? Or was that all part of the show?
The 2 things that bothered about labeling Trump controlled opposition was the economy, and the opposition from the media. However, opposition from the media is what caused us to defend Trump! Why! Because conservatives have a general aversion to false accusations and we like to defend the innocent. The media purposely attacked Trump to provoke conservatives in to defending him. It also worked with Kavanaugh. How many protestant Christians would normally defend a Jesuit for the Supreme Court? Yet we ALL defended Kavanaugh because of the “persecution” he was getting. It was a slick trick, and we all fell for it.
But what about the economy? Wasn’t it a great economy? Sure. But who benefited the most? With a planned COVID crisis coming, the economy was never going to recover, but it DID benefit certain classes of people. If you KNOW a crisis is coming, you want to start prepping and building a nest egg, right? Trump’s economy benefited all of the Big Tech giants, Amazon, Elon Musk, and thousands of other moguls who are part of the Deep State, all who can ride out the storm now in spite of an impending recession or depression. The “booming economy” guaranteed that all of our overseers will not need to worry about their bills or obligations when the rest of the country is out of work. It’s a way to create a permanent slave class while guaranteeing that the tech giants can build a BEAST system unscathed by the COVID plandemic. Keep in mind, that it was Trump that approved of the initial lockdowns in the first place that led to the first wave of job losses.
So long as Trump told us what we wanted to hear, and Q Anon suckered everyone into “trusting the plan”, nobody revolted, or at least thought about revolting until it was too late. That’s controlled opposition. Trump has been loyal to his Rockefeller sock puppets the entire time. I’ll save the Nazi connections with Richard Nixon and Trump’s uncle, John Trump and the connection to Tesla, Elon Musk, and Nazi technology for another article.
Trump is now pushing a vaccine that will permanently alter your DNA. He endorsed vaccines that are experimental, and which gives the global government a perfect opportunity to use this is a test run for mark of the beast technology (I’m not saying vaccines are the mark, they are not in spite well-meaning prophecy teachers, but they do open the door for the tracking and mandatory receipt of unwanted bodily intrusions that you will either get or be unable to travel and eventually buy or sell without proof of vaccination, and in the future, proof of a mark).
Trump also helped negotiate a two-state solution in Israel in the recent Abraham Accords, which is dividing God’s land: one of the reasons He judges the nations (Joel 3:2).
This doesn’t mean that Christians were wrong to vote for him. We can only vote on the information we have. We may not have liked some things about him, but our plight was about saving America from Communism. It was about saving our Constitution, not about a shady past and potty mouthed hedonist, so for patriotic Americans, it wasn’t about the person, but about the document that expresses our rights and liberties, and Trump just happened to be the only person available that we HOPED would make that happen. But that HOPE is what kept the people from revolting, and now the Deep State and Big Tech are so enriched and coordinated that a revolt is almost impossible to mount.
There’s a LOT more reasons to think Trump is controlled opposition given by my friend, Scott Johnson on ContendingForTruth.Com . Now I don’t agree with all of Scott’s arguments or conclusions because, in my opinion, some of the sources are too mainstream to be credible, and those from Wayne Marsden I believe are so bogus that even Snopes debunked them. But overall, I think Scott makes a good case for Trump being controlled opposition.
I voted for Trump. Twice. But Trump threw in the towel and gave up. That’s what a controlled puppet would do. Let people have hope right up until the clock runs out.
James A., PhD
One of the accusations against Constantine Simonides’ claims to being the actual author of the Codex Sinaiticus is that he was a forger (you would think being a forger, if true, actual FAVORS Simonides, not discredits him!), and thus was a liar. Although, no accusation of forgery against Simonides was ever proven, and at least on one occasion, Constantine Tischendorf had to retract a claim against Simonides regarding the Shepherd of Hermes.
In a debate with Chris Pinto, James White sided with the Romanists that Simonides was a forger. But there’s a glaring omission in White’s debate tactic against Pinto. White demanded that Pinto point to the examplar that Simonides used for Codex Sinaiticus if there was to be any truth to Simonides’ claims. I personally thought this line of debate was irrelevant given that Simonides produced 2 Greek copies of Hermas and Barnabas unknown to exist any where else in Christendom, so he obviously had exemplars that nobody else seen, but I digress. What’s interesting about White’s logic is that not once did he ever attempt to point to any exemplars that Simonides used for his so-called “forgeries”.
Wouldn’t that be important? I mean, come on, if it was important for Pinto to produce evidence of the exemplar Simonides used for Sinaiticus, would it not be equally important to point to the exemplars that Simonides used in documents he was accused of forging? That fact that White omits this shows he knew that line of questioning was a red herring that had nothing to do with Simonides claims to the authorship of Sinaiticus.
The debate tactics and logic of the rabid anti King James Only crowd is nearly as bad as the fake news main stream media.
I am reposting the Breitbart list because it was hacked earlier this week, and will likely be attacked again given liberal’s bent on interfering in the upcoming elections. When referencing these facts, please quote/site/link the Breitbart article unless it’s not working.
James A., PhD
Imagine if a new political party arose in America called “Death to America”, and it’s values were stated as follows:
*We believe in the abolishment of private property
*We believe that America is an illegitimate nation founded on the backs of slaves
*The United States Constitution is outdated and should reflect the progressive values of modern liberalism, and therefore needs to be reconstructed
*We believe government should be in control of all private business and means of production (including insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, etc..). We believe that all earnings from the working class should be equally distributed by the state for the provision of the masses, each according to his ability, each according to his need.
*We believe the state should impose mandatory education on all children under 18, and the school curriculum should be dictated by the state. No “higher education” should be permitted or degrees conferred except upon approval of state accreditation
*We advocate control of all media, with ‘fact checkers’ utilized to determine whether any agency or person attempts to be an “independent media figure”. If the Fact Finders make such a determination that the views or opinions of the independent media appear to rival or be antithetical to the views of Death to America, they shall be censored
*We believe that guns are unnecessary. No person should have the “right” to bear arms. All munitions should be utilized by the state and its agents
*We believe in open borders. Nationalism, patriotism, should be abolished and in its place recognition of a global cooperation that incorporates the values of all nations and ideologies however antithetical to the so-called “United States of America”
*Christianity is an affront to democracy and should be outlawed, and its participants ridiculed and incarcerated for causing sedition, hate and division
*We believe that the very name “United States of America” should be amended. “United States OF America” reflects an unacceptable sense of sovereignty to the exclusion of other nations. Our goal is to have a United States of a New World Order
Would the ACLU and Southern Poverty Law Center seek to defend politicians attempting to gain office who openly subscribe to these views? Would Republicans accept this albeit however reluctantly because such views are protected by “Freedom of Speech”? The fact is, the ACLU has already defended it: it’s called Communism/Socialism/Progessivism./Marxism, and it is the prevailing view of the modern Democratic Party, with a few nuances to protect their rhetoric in carefully crafted subterfuge.
In the early 1900s, the ACLU (which was itself founded by Communists) successfully challenged numerous ‘Criminal Syndicalism” laws that protected Communists from prosecution. Although the Constitution would seemingly protect a variety of speech in the public arena, it is unconscionable to think that these protections would extend to practices for legislatures. Common sense dictates that the founding fathers had no intention of allowing a politician to hold office in any of our three branches of government who openly advocated for the destruction of everything that our Constitution stands for. Yet that’s exactly what has happened. Through the fallacious logic of reductionism, the ACLU argues that the right to express different ideas in pubic extends to the right to implement those policies in practice as an employee of the government.
Some Democrats, like Bernie Sanders, and Democrat candidates (like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) overtly identify themselves as “Democratic Socialists” (it should be remembered that one of the leading parties that preceded the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia was called “Democrat Socialists”, so the attempts of Sanders and his defenders’ to persuade Americans that Democratic Socialism is some novel concept that isn’t really borrowed from “radicals” like Stalin, Lenin and Hitler, is very disingenuous). Hillary Clinton praised a radical Marxist, and revered him as her mentor (Saul Alinsky, who’s book “Rules for Radicals” has become the playbook for Democrat Jihadists like ANTIFA). Project Veritas has exposed a plethora of operatives openly admitting their tactics to undermine the current administration in a series of undercover videos. The modern Democratic Party *IS* the party of Soviet Socialism. [This probably explains why they accused Trump of “colluding with Russia”. Part of Socialist/Communist propaganda is to accuse your enemy of doing exactly what you are doing]
Alarms against the dangers of Communism were sounded off loudly in the 1950s. In 1954, President Eisenhower signed the Communist Control Act. This act has never been repealed (although the Supreme Court ruled that it could not prevent members of the Communist Party from participating in insurance benefits programs. Communist Party v Catherwood, 367 U.S. 389 (1961)). The infamous “Naked Communist” was the product of notes taken from Congressional hearings on Communism which included over 40 stated goals of the Communist Party. It would be wise for our current administration to reconsider reviving this Act, and enforcing it.
Not only should Republicans do everything they can to reverse the Communist infestation, but I argue that its persistence in America presents law abiding gun owners of America a justifiable grounds for civil war. The Second Amendment was designed primarily to protect us from a tyrannical government, and with the direction that the Democrat Party is headed, America will eventually be Venezuela and Soviet Russia if the Democrats have their way. The Democratic Mob has adopted the Communist “any means necessary” mantra to implement their ideas, including 600 documented cases of violence against conservatives, and we’ve patiently endured their persecutions, trying to ameliorate problems in America peacefully through debate and civil discourse. But Democrats have closed their ears to debate. Hillary Clinton admitted that civility will only return to America if Democrats get control of the House and Senate, and former Attorney General Eric Holder under Czar Obama encouraged Democrats to kick Republicans if they’re down. Americans may not like the idea, and I’m sure nobody in 1776 got warm & fuzzy over the idea of war, either, but we are at a fork in the road where it’s either another 1776, or we give up and submit to slavery to Communists. As a Christian, I hate violence, but I have a duty to protect my family, and my country, and so do you.
The Democrat Party has never held American values. It has been a party of racism and slavery since its inception, and is now openly advocating for the destruction of America and the suppression of conservatism up to and including the use of violence, and the censorship of conservatives on all social media outlets. The liberal machine has so infested our government and strategically planted operatives in every part of our government that war may be the ONLY way to get our country back. We went to war once over a country that treated us exactly the way Democrats are treating America now, and then again, when the same Democratic Party in place today refused to recognize the God given rights of African Americans. I believe a third war is inevitable because the Democratic Party will not stop their subversion until they have gained complete control of our country, and turned America back into their old plantations, and if we let them, Death to America won’t be an analogy for a blog post, it will be a reality.
____________________________________________
I would also encourage readers to peruse the Declaration of Independence, and look at the reasons we went to war with England. What the Democratic Party has done has far exceeded the grounds we relied on to fight the British in 1776.
THE NAKED COMMUNIST: 45 COMMUNIST GOALS
On Jan. 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida read a list of 45 Communist goals into the Congressional Record. The list was derived from researcher Cleon Skousen’s book “The Naked Communist.” These principles are well worth revisiting today in order to gain insights into the thinking and strategies of much of our so-called liberal elite:
1. U.S. should accept coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.
2. U.S. should be willing to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war. [Note: These encapsulate the Kennan Doctrine, which advocated for the “containment” of communism. Establishment figures supporting the amoral containment policy at least implicitly worked with the communists in scaring the wits out of the American people concerning atomic war. President Ronald Reagan undid the doctrine when he took an aggressive stand against the Evil Empire by backing freedom fighters from around the world that were struggling against the left-wing communist jackboot. As a result, the Soviet Union and its satellites imploded, aconsiderable and unexpected setback to the international communist edifice.]
3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the U.S. would be a demonstration of “moral strength.” [Note: The nuclear freeze advocates supported a freeze on American nuclear development only. Rarely were Soviet nukes or those of other nations mentioned in their self-righteous tirades. The same advocates now call for reducing American military might, claiming that there is something immoral about America preserving its military pre-eminence in the world.]
4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war. [Note: Today, there are calls to end the embargo on the slave island of Cuba, there were complaints about the embargo against Iraq, and the U.S., not Saddam Hussein, was blamed for the suffering of the Iraqi people. Would they have advocated for free trade with Hitler and his National Socialist regime?]
5. Extend long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.
6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination. [Note: Such aid and trade over decades contributed greatly to the left-wing communist liquidation of over 100 million people worldwide, according to the well-documented “Black Book of Communism.” This aid and trade marks a shameful chapter in American history. Without the aid and trade, the left-wing international communist behemoth would have imploded on its own rot a lot sooner and umpteen millions would have been saved from poverty, misery, starvation and death.]
7. Grant recognition of Red China and admission of Red China to the U.N. [Note: Not only did President Jimmy Carter fulfill this goal but he also betrayed America’s allies in Nicaragua, El Salvador, Iran, Afghanistan, Angola and elsewhere.]
8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.
9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.
10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.
11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. [Note: There are still American intellectuals, and elected members of Congress, who dream of an eventual one world government and who view the U.N., founded by communists such as Alger Hiss, the first secretary-general, as the instrument to bring this about. World government was also the dream of Adolf Hitler and J.V. Stalin. World government was the dream of Osama bin Laden and the 9/11 hijackers.]
12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party. [Note: While the idea of banning any political party runs contrary to notions of American freedom and liberty, notions that are the exact opposite of those held by the left-wing communists themselves, nevertheless these goals sought to undermine the constitutional obligation of Congress to investigate subversion. The weakening of our government’s ability to conduct such investigations led to the attack of 9/11.]
13. Do away with loyalty oaths. [Note: It is entirely proper and appropriate for our government to expect employees, paid by theAmerican taxpayer, to take an oath of loyalty.]
14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.
15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S. [Note: In his book, “Reagan’s War,” Peter Schweizer demonstrates the astonishing degree to which communists and communist sympathizers have penetrated the Democratic Party. In his book, Schweizer writes about the presidential election of 1979.]
16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights. [Note: This strategy goes back to the founding of the American Civil Liberties Union by Fabian Socialists Roger Baldwin and John Dewey and Communists William Z. Foster and Elizabeth Gurley Flynn among others.]
17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
18. Gain control of all student newspapers.
19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations that are under Communist attack. [Note:The success of these goals, from a communist perspective, is obvious. Is there any doubt this is so?]
20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.
22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings,” substituting shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.
23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. ” Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”
24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV. [Note: This is the Gramscian agenda of the “long march through the institutions” spelled out explicitly: gradual takeover of the “means of communication” and then using those vehicles to debauch the culture and weaken the will of the individual to resist.]
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural and healthy.” [Note: Today those few who still have the courage to advocate public morality are denounced and viciously attacked. Most Americans are entirely unwitting regarding the motives behind this agenda.]
27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.” [Note: This has been largely accomplished through the communist infiltration of the National Council of Churches, Conservative and Reform Judaism, and the Catholic seminaries.]
28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state”
29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
30. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”
31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over. [Note: Obliterating the American past, with its antecedents in principles of freedom, liberty and private ownership is a major goal of the communists then and now.]
32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.
34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.
35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.
36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.
38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat. [Note: The Soviets used to send “social misfits” and those deemed politically incorrect to massive mental institutions called gulags. The Red Chinese call them lao gai. Hitler called them concentration camps.]
39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose communist goals. [Note: Psychiatry remains a bulwark of the communist agenda of fostering self-criticism and docility.]
40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. [Note: Done! The sovereign family is the single most powerful obstacle to authoritarian control.]
41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. [Note: Outcome-based education, values clarification or whatever they’re calling it this year.]
42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems. [Note: This describes the dialectical fostering of group consciousness and conflict, which furthers the interests of authoritarianism.]
43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.
44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.
45. Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems.
Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike.
ATHEIST EQUIVOCATION ON INFORMATION
James A, Ph.D
I will say more about the following in an upcoming article but I noticed something interesting about debating atheists on mutations one hand (as to whether mutations produce new information sufficient to prove particles to people), and information theory on the other (that information itself in DNA/RNA and protein sequences shows an intelligent programmer behind their coding systems).
When atheists/naturalists/materialist argue in favor of mutations, they attempt to show that mutations do add new information (whether they are arguing from insertions, or bacterial resistance, etc…). Of course, they are wrong about their assumptions and conclusions, but that’s not the point. They must concede to a common sense definition of information to even begin to argue that their view of mutations adds new information.
However, when arguing about information theory, their first line of attack is to challenge the definition of information! Now think about that:if the atheist isn’t settled on what exactly “information” even means, then why would they be comfortable in their conclusions that, for example, insertions show evidence of new information? Why is it that the atheist/naturalist/materialist needs a functional definition of information* (since they know they are at a loss to explain the origin of information in DNA) when they don’t need a definition for information when arguing for new information in mutations!
This is just one more example of how atheists/naturalists/materialists use dishonest tactics to defend their a priori bias against a Creator.
_______
*When it comes to a thorough definition of information, I have always relied on the 5 levels explicated by Werner Gitt (In the Beginning Was Information). The atheists will always erect their straw man arguments against Shannon’s Theory of information even though I’ve consistently made it clear that SHANNON isn’t my source.
Why I Voted For Trump
James A., Ph.D
I’ll make this simple enough a liberal can understand it. We’ll start with a story.
In Afghanistan, there was a SGT leading troops away from an ambush. Only two people knew the escape route, the SGT, and the female CORPORAL that tipped off the enemy to their location. If the unit wants to survive they need to make a choice as to which person is going to lead them to the safe passage.
However, there’s a snag. Ms CORPORAL tells the group that SGT can’t be trusted because he’s immoral and he cheated on his wife. So the soldiers make a decision. They don’t like what the SGT did, and are personally mortified by it, but in this situation, they can either do nothing, in which case they will still die, trust CORPORAL who they know sold them out, which means they will die, or follow the SGT.
Liberals would’ve rather that conservative Christians did nothing in 2016, which is still a choice. So they constantly point to Trump’s past immoral behavior (and blatantly obvious, patently false accusations) in an attempt to guilt Christians into not supporting religious freedom, second amendment defense, freedom of speech, economic stability (which has a direct impact on churches, pastors earn their salaries from their members- if the economy is bad, the pastors suffer, and liberals are well aware of this. Why do you think Obama sicked the IRS on churches?), and a secure border. In other words, liberals think you should give up your constitutional freedoms because the man currently enforcing them is immoral. Never mind the double standards among liberals who defended Bill Clinton which is sort of telling: liberals know intuitively that objective moral values and duties exist, they simply choose to hate God and live like moral relativists (although they live like objectivists when defending THEIR actions and opinions) while expecting the Christian to maintain their standards. Of course, a Christian should live according to God’s standards whether a relativist does or not, but do so according to what’s actually in the Scripture, not according to the straw men and misguided arguments used by liberals. It’s a standard leftist tactic to attempt to polarize Christians and make them back down from politics by using some reductio ad absurdum logic to reduce any flaw in a politician as a reason you as a Christian shouldn’t support them. This way, they can have their cake and eat it, too.
Granted, I’d prefer someone else (sorry Trumpers). Knowing someone believes in objective moral values that are derived from our Creator makes it a little easier to believe someone is being honest and sincere which is important to politics. But the anomaly here is that while I don’t believe Trump is a serious Christian, he’s at least a theist that is at least striving to protect God-given rights, and he’s surrounded by good influences like Mike Pence. The alternative was to follow a communist/socialist witch who put our national security at risk by giving Russia nuclear bomb material (which they sold to Iran), and whose policies have always been aimed at destroying America and facilitating a coup that leads to America joining a satanic globalist one world order and began criminalizing Christianity (which has been in the works for decades under both Democrats and establishment Republicans).
So no, I don’t support Trump the person, but I do support a free market, strong economy, border security, freedom of religion and speech, conservative justices and judges being appointed, restrictions on abortion, deregulation, etc..and I will vote exactly the same way in 2020 if my only options are SGT and CORPORAL again. And whether the liberals like it, accept it, or believe it, we care enough about them to do what’s best FOR THEM, not their best interests (we’ve seen what their interests are and it’s not pretty), even if they don’t get it, and even if they hate us for it.
__________________
For some more detailed explications of the above arguments, see my article on Why Liberal Media Censors Fundamentalists
UPDATED: 2/8/18
Dr. James A
Twitter has for the first time placed restrictions on my account. I exposed Twitter’s Shadow Ban in 2017 by acquiring a list of accounts Twitter had on a black list. Project Veritas also recently exposed Twitter for targeting conservatives in an undercover operation that was caught on camera. I have also shown that Twitter was responsible for compromising Sara Carter and Sean Hannity’s accounts these last few weeks. Thus, I’m not surprised that Twitter has finally censored me. I now have legal standing to sue them! Thank you Twitter, see you in court.
This is what Twitter suspended me over
That AIDS was initially called “Gay Related Immune Deficiency” is a historical fact. Of course, I get called names on an hourly basis on Twitter, but because the accusers/harassers are liberals, Deep State sycophants that worship the ground George Soros and Hillary Clinton walk on, they get away with it. And naturally, you don’t see the context of the conversation, nor the vile things that were being said to me in that thread.
The second tweet is another historical fact. The Jews were enslaved by the Egyptians for 400 years. Even those who don’t follow the Bible know this fact. So now, it’s “hate speech” to give Bible and History facts! This fact is always forgotten about whenever liberal media wants to constantly vilify ALL white people (and the fact that I am an Indigenous American from the Chumesh Tribe makes this even funnier!)
Furthermore, these 2 tweets are nearly A YEAR OLD.
It is interesting though that some people from the James White Cult (Twitter.com/DrOakley1689, director of Alpha & Omega Ministries) threatened to report me for being “anti gay”, because they don’t like me exposing him for the hypocrite and lying wolf in sheep’s clothing that he is. So, there’s that, too.
Twitter has turned into the very Nazis that they claim they are censoring. If you are conservative politically, and Christian, expect Twitter to throw you in the Gulags. However, now you have to beware of these radical Calvinists who stoop so low as to act like they’re gay in order to silence their theological adversaries.
*UPDATE 2/8/18 I was sent a screenshot of a devout James White sycophant who admitted to reporting me. 
Dr. James A., PhD
In having a small Twitter debate with about 10 atheists, we discussed the foundations of morality (or rather, I discussed their foundations, the others punted to evolution). When I demonstrated that morality is not something that can be empirically tested and therefore can not fall under the umbrella of scientism, the Trolley Car Problem was raised to show that science can offer laboratory level evaluations of morality, and hence, there’s no need to posit God as the ontological foundation of morals because science can explain them through natural means.
However, that objection is somewhat of a red herring and a category fallacy. The argument was about the grounding of morality, not what dilemmas can be trumped-up by hypothetical scenarios. A laboratory may conduct experiments that observe behavior, but it can’t tell you how much a moral decision weighs, or what color thoughts are. It also can’t give you a scientific explanation as to why the scientist ought be honest in his interpretation of the data (perhaps deceiving people is the greater good because the population is too ignorant to understand the experts).
The reader can view the Wikipedia version of the Trolley Car Problem (since this was the reference cited by the atheist). It is called a “problem” because the solution appears to present an impossible conundrum that would demonstrate that there are no objective moral duties or obligations because nobody can point to a single set standard that would offer the right decision to make in the dilemma. However, there’s an enormous problem with this logic that serves to prove that objective moral duties and obligations actually do exist, and that the dilemma doesn’t serve as a valid rebuttal against objectivism (let alone as an objection against the grounding of morality).
First of all, whether the Trolley Car Problem attacks the grounding of morality is non sequitur. The dilemma merely shows that the expressions of morality, how they are implemented may be applied in different ways. But what’s overlooked is WHY this is even a dilemma in the first place! The dilemma actually presupposes that human life is valuable, and that regardless of what decisions CAN be made, the dilemma presupposes that some decision-whatever that may be- OUGHT to be made based upon some standard that saves the greatest amount of lives. Furthermore, it also presupposes that a decision that would result in the deliberate taking of a life would be objectively wrong in the event that killing one person to save another would be the “proper” choice. Any choice made is founded on the presupposition that human life has value. The dilemma does not posit that a person may make the wrong choice if the subject were a dog or porcupine. The dilemma is there because it is a HUMAN life at stake, which shows the innate recognition of the value of human life over animals. If a person were to pull the lever to save a wounded bird resulting in the death of children, we would conclude that person was insane.
The dilemma does nothing to refute that objective moral duties and obligations exists. Rather, it must presuppose them in order for this to even be accurately deemed a dilemma. If some transcendent standard of right and wrong does not exist, then why OUGHT I care who lives or dies in this dilemma? Perhaps the fat man is a serial killer and killing him would’ve been the right decision after all because it helps protect the species. But then again, why is protecting the species good in the first place?( The survival of the species presupposes that there is a good purpose for mankind, but even Richard Dawkins admits that evolution proves that we are made in a world that is purposeless. Even if these survival genes were naturally selected, how did natural selection know what would be good for the species in order to know how to craft the genes that would choose what is good? I digress.) Perhaps the serial killer only kills other sociopaths and in evolutionary concepts taken to their most logical conclusions, that helps propagate the species and is therefore a “good” thing. Atheists and evolutionists have no reasonable answers for why someone OUGHT to be moral, or why they SHOULD do what is right.
The Trolley Car Problem merely explains descriptions of different behaviors (or different possible behaviors), but this reduces morality to conduct, and that’s not the argument. It does not lead to a valid critique against the ontological foundations of morality, but rather, reinforces them. Thus, the Trolley Car Problem really isn’t a problem at all. It is merely a spin on the so-called problem of evil, which presupposes that there’s some standard of justice and righteousness that some action or inaction has deviated from. If there’s no God, objective moral duties and obligations do not exist. Objective moral duties and obligations exists, therefore, God exists. Where there’s a moral law, there’s a moral lawgiver, and this is a basic fact known to even the atheists that claim not to know so.
________________
I will address more on the difference between the order of knowing and being in part 2 of this as there is one more objection written by another critic in this same conversation. Atheists and evolutionists often confuse epistemology with ontology in arguing for the existence of morality, and that will be taken up in my next response.
[This is ONLY the rough draft, but I’m publishing some of it early since I said I’d have it by the weekend. There’s just too many screenshots to upload to make this a quick post, but there’s enough below that readers will get the point about why I refer to James White followers as the “James White Cult”. I will add to this post and fix errors later]
Dr. James A., PhD
Part 1 of this series will focus on the cultic mindset that the worshipful sycophants of James White of Alpha & Omega “Ministries” display in support of him. Scripture tells us that if a ruler hearkens to lies, all his servants are wicked (Proverbs 29:12). This is certainly analogous to the instant case where James White’s followers employ an “any means necessary” strategy to suppress dissent against White, rivaled only by the most vile social justice warriors like Antifa. These Saul Alinsky type tactics are indicative of White’s leadership.
White’s followers are made of mostly anonymous accounts. Those on the Twitter #Oldpaths hashtag are well aware of the years of harassment they’ve experienced from thousands of these accounts. Many of White’s supporters created parody accounts of his detractors to stalk them, and follow their every online move. Most recently, this has been done to me, Pastor Steve Camp, Brannon Howse, and several others who have opposed White’s recent participation in Islamic interfaith dialogues.
Now granted, under most circumstances it would be erroneous and fallacious to attribute to White actions that are merely done on his behalf (a sort of guilt by association). However, White has not only acknowledged these accounts, BUT ACTIVELY ENDORSES AND ENCOURAGES THEM
DrAchMonitor to whom White is responding along with my own Twitter account tagged (DortChristians) is a parody account made by Fred Butler of Grace To You Ministries. Although I have repeatedly emphasized that Dr. James Ach and Dr. James A (me) are not the same, White’s cult has found the accusation a useful gaff in trying to aggravate me. But nevertheless, all references the White cult makes regarding “Ach” are meant to identify me. Why that’s important to them is a mystery, but I digress.
It is also of interest that well it’s perfectly acceptable for White to consult with parody accounts, to point out White’s errors and hypocrisy is “stalking”. How one doesn’t see the irony in praising a parody account while in the same breath denouncing “stalking” is beyond me. But it does show quite a breach in White’s logic, or simply reveals his true motives in the lengths he’s willing to go to discredit his adversaries. But, since White has “single-handedly” saved the Muslim world, there is nothing off limits in protecting your Superman. 
Here are just a few examples of the most vile, vitriolic, nasty, and egregious posts from White’s cult. Once you have read them, you will be able to see right through the Alinsky tactics they use in accusing White’s adversaries of doing the very thing that THEY specialize in. It is ironic that when I opened the door to debate on of these parodies, Calvinist Fish, he would not answer whether or not Jesus is Lord, and I have long suspected that some of White’s most ardent supporters are atheists and Muslims.
First of all, White’s supporters brag out “trolling”. The following is from James White’s daughter’s best friend, Katie Boettcher (“Catbo222”) 
Here is “Pastor” Nick Johnson, making fun of the plight of my minor children. (Screenshot and explanation) It is one thing to point out a minister’s adult child involved in theological error or blatant unbiblical practices (as with James White’s daughter supporting Jesuit teacher and feminist, Karen Swallow Prior-whom James White himself has criticized for using ‘gay affirming’ language, and his daughter’s endorsement of an LGBT musical group, Pentatonix), but quite another to use a tragedy that has occured to your minor children not in your custody against you because you’re not adult enough, or Christian enough, to handle criticism of your favorite religious personality.
Next, we have the White Klan using some course homosexual jokes, and a song about “ding a lings” to describe me, which James White seemed to really appreciate
Of course, “The Monitor” tried to explain away the blatant sexual references of the Chuck Berry song, but any casual perusal of the lyrics can clearly see its not about high school bells.
White’s followers even stooped so low as to try and get my account suspended by saying that I was attacking LGBTs because I was criticizing them 
WHAT KILLS YOU MAKES YOU STRONGER! ROMANS 8:13, 7:24-25 |AN IFB MINISTRY
WHAT KILLS YOU MAKES YOU STRONGER! ROMANS 8:13, 7:24-25 |AN IFB MINISTRY
WHAT KILLS YOU MAKES YOU STRONGER! ROMANS 8:13, 7:24-25 |AN IFB MINISTRY
Do Right Christians 