Archive for the ‘NEWS’ Category

James A., Ph.D, Paralegal

In my professional opinion, the following is what I believe happened:

Daniels knew the risk of a defamation suit, so she never wanted to say she slept with Trump. She approached Trump’s lawyer, Michael Cohen, first, and said she MAY HAVE slept with Trump (she was quite evasive on Jimmy Kimmel so she has a pattern of this kind of elusive ambiguity and ‘read-between-the-lines’ gimmicks). Daniels knew that with the media hosting several ‘sexual assault victims’ against Trump during the election, this would be a hot story, but it’s better to try getting a pay day then to have to prove the story if challenged.

Cohen then took it upon himself to offer her a pay day ($130,000) thinking he’s doing Trump a favor, and would foolishly think that Trump would reimburse him for being such a fine, thoughtful lawyer. So Cohen offered to pay for her silence over a story that was likely a bluff to begin with. That Cohen acted on his own explains why Trump’s name was not used in the non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”), and why there was no signature (not even of the supposed alias, David Dennison). Why any lawyer would think that using an alias would constitute a binding contractual obligation is beyond me, but I digress.

As a year passes, Daniels thinks she can get more than $130K because several media outlets are now offering her a lot of money to dish on Trump, but she acts as if she can’t speak of “it”, she can simply give the IMPRESSION that something happened without ever having to actually confirm it. To bolster this impression even more, her lawyers then sue Trump over the NDA, not because Daniels actually plans to tell a story, but because the lawsuit actually puts the NDA in the public. Hence, Daniels can speak through her lawyer without Daniels actually confirming the affair so as to not violate the NDA, but it’s not quite defamation against Daniels if it’s the lawyer saying “it” and not Daniels (the lawyer can simply say he “thought” that’s what his client meant), and by putting the NDA in the spotlight, it gives the appearance that SOMETHING must have happened or there wouldn’t be an NDA in the first place. In other words, Daniels and her lawyers have constructed a slick legal maneuver to get around the NDA, while at the same time, using the NDA as the ‘evidence’ that an affair actually occurred because the NDA makes it appear as if Trump has something to hide. It’s a way of making petitio principii a bona fide legal maneuver.

Daniels’ lawyers have thrown a monkey wrench into the plot, though. Perhaps inadvertently. They publicly claimed that Daniels can speak about the “affair” without being in violation of the NDA because Trump never signed the NDA which makes the contract void. The question then remains, if that were true- WHY HASN’T SHE? I believe she’s simply waiting for the biggest offer from the likes of CNN, MSNBC or Megyn Kelly and the highest bidder gets a (not THE) story. Think about it, what’s the real risk in speaking out? If these allegations were true, do we REALLY think that Trump’s going to enforce an NDA that he claims no knowledge of? Daniels’ lawyers have surely thought of that as well. If Trump litigated a breach of contract, it would be a tacit admission to the allegations. The smartest thing mainstream media could do to implicate Trump would’ve been to pay Daniels millions of dollars to breach her NDA and dare Trump to sue her over it. So then why hasn’t she spoken? Because Trump was never involved in the first place, and the agreement was solely between Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels without Trump ever being privy to the NDA. To speak out over a story that she knows is false would give her and the mainstream media a bloody nose. But as long as she can continue to play a game of well placed ambiguities she stays protected…and gets paid for it.

Trump probably first found out about the NDA when the FEC questioned Cohen and it was leaked to the media. Trump would’ve likely then called Cohen to his office and asked him why he did such a stupid thing like let some porn actress dupe him into a settlement when what Cohen should’ve done was brought this to the attention of the president and called her bluff. It wasn’t an accusation of sexual assault so it likely wouldn’t have affected the campaign. If the other 13 accusers and the Billy Bush tape didn’t slow the campaign down, one has to wonder what Cohen was thinking here. Cohen panicked.

The media will do anything to sabotage Trump’s presidency even if that includes trying to destroy all of his family members and his marriage. There’s even the possibility that the Deep State and the media want to create a scenario where after Trump hides an affair after the birth of his son with Melania, Melania becomes so enraged that she wants Trump dead; the Deep State then arranges the assassination and blames it on the First Lady.  (Think about the speculation surrounding the Kennedy assassination regarding Jackie Kennedy’s motive for supposedly assisting in the assassination of her husband after discovering JFK’s multiple affairs, including one with Marilyn Monroe.) Granted, I believe the initial motive of the Democrats is to link the payment of this NDA to an election campaign issue as a grounds to impeach Trump, but they know they can’t prove Trump knew about it, so I believe there’s a much bigger, long-game with this Stormy Daniels issue.

I believe Cohen made a foolish choice and expected to get compensated for it. I’m reminded of a time where I bought my mother something expensive for her car that I thought she needed without getting her permission first. My mother didn’t want the item and certainly it was unreasonable to ask for reimbursement because I made the decision on my own (a refund was not an option). Cohen owns this, and there’s no evidence that Trump actually did what Daniel’s said, or that he knew about the claims that made up the substance of the NDA. But I’m sure at this point, Daniels will come up with a Stephen King novel if she gets paid enough.

On a personal note, as a Christian I am disgusted by many of Trump’s past trysts, and I don’t think Trump has a very knowledgeable spiritual life. But the reality is actual conservatives had a Hobson’s choice: elect an immoral boss who at least wanted to honestly help the country with policies that we agreed with, or express our outrage over his immoral behavior by letting a murdering, deceitful Communist/Socialist in office that would’ve destroyed what’s left of any freedoms America had. Those Never Trumpers who call that an erroneous ‘lesser of two evils’ argument are…well…idiots.


Dr. James A., PhD

The fake news New York Times reported that hackers have been targeting nuclear facilities in Kansas. We’ve heard this before when NYT’s sister, Washington Post, fabricated a similar claim. Naturally, the culprits of this so-called attack are…..the Russians. Shocking, right! Just when the Russian narrative was beginning to die as a result of testimony in Congress from Comey and Jeh Johnson,  CNN admitting the entire Russian narrative is a “nothing burger”, and the fact there was never any evidence of collusion in the first place, the globalist, foreign-owned NYT keeps finding ways to keep the Russian conspiracy going. Why anyone with common sense would believe that offline data storage is subject to outside interference is beyond me. Granted, the report states they are merely trying to get personal credentials, but that still requires someone to be on the inside of the plant to use the credentials, and to pull something off like a complete nuclear meltdown would require numerous events to occur at the same time, something that just can’t be pulled off from any hacker group from outside of the country. But most liberals are low-information zombies that will believe anything the mainstream media feeds them.

What NYT is now attempting to do, is to create a panic in America by spewing a manufactured crisis that hits a little closer to home than a Russia-interfered-with-the-election scenario. Liberals are rioting over the election results, but if they thought that, in addition to Russia’s supposed election interference, that Russia is also now threatening to melt America by crashing a nuclear facility, well that just adds insult to injury and gives liberals justification to physically attack Trump and his supporters in an all out coup on the grounds of protecting American lives from a clear and present danger and imminent threat.

The other frightful side of this is that it could also be used to stage a false-flag attack. In other words, globalists cause the melt down at the Kansas facility, blame it on Russian hackers, which will then lead to all out chaos. These elite scum are not immune to staging a massive crisis (remember 9/11). Globalism lost on November 8, 2016, and Democrats, Never Trumpers, George Soros, et al, are desperate to regain the momentum they’d gained within the last 8 years under Obama. They’ve invested billions to destroy America from within and isolate us from our allies in Europe (part of the Islamic immigration strategy). Nobody invests that kind of money and just quits. The greater the desperation, the more massive the crisis needed to implement the globalists much touted mantra, “order out of chaos“.


I’m going to update this article a little later after I gather some more information. But it’s a serious enough threat that I needed to help get the ball rolling now on the conversation. My friend DAHBOO77 has caught on as well, and will be following this story.

UPDATE: This false flag of causing a meltdown may also be a precipice for an EMP attack that would cripple the power grid.  Ironically, Kansas has one of the largest productions of gas and coal energy in the United States.  A staged EMP would cause chaos with millions out of power. Of course, this would also shut down the internet. The power would probably be restored long enough for CNN to tell us what ‘really’ happened with the claim that they can’t yet bring the internet back up.

Dr. James A., Ph.D.

[CORRECTION: All references to “MSNBC” should read MSM {Main Stream Media}]

I have put off writing this for some time because I’ve followed Infowars for almost 20 years and wanted to give them the benefit of a doubt. I have written some critiques about Alex Jones’ New Age Christian Syncretism, but still supported his news research. But something really shook my confidence in Jones when he committed to a 180 degree turn around on the Pizza Gate scandal, as did his guest, Mike Cernovich.

I’m not going to break down all of the details of Pizza Gate. That task has been tackled by NUMEROUS other people (including professional journalists). For the sake of brevity, I’m keeping the facts to argumentative points and will not litter this opinion with too many references because for the purposes of this article, the argument is more important.

Alex initially “apologized” for “exposing” Pizza Gate in March, 2017, which was then circulated by all the liberal media as proof that “alt right” is fake news, as even admitted by the “alt right godfather”. On April 4, 2017, Alex interviewed Mike Cernovich following his revelation about Susan Rice evidence that she played a part in unmasking Trump associates illegally. Alex reaffirmed his denouncement of Pizza Gate, to which Cernovich agreed; which is ironic because Cernovich had only recently been interviewed by 60 Minutes where he affirmed that Pizza Gate was NOT “fake news”. But now both Cernovich and Alex claim that Pizza Gate (hereinafter,”PG”) is the fabrication of the deep state to distract from security clearances being denied to potential Trump staffers.

The following are just a few points that show Alex and Mike are….FULL OF IT, and I will view everything they publish from here on out with a grain of salt.


Alex has repeatedly taken credit for either being behind PG or pushing it into the spotlight along with MSNBC, and figured out in early December 2016 that PG was a Deep State (“DS”) conspiracy to distract from “real pedophilia”.  According to Alex, the information about “code words” wrapped in pizza rhetoric was actually planted by the DS. This is ABSURD for several reasons.

PG began by others crowd-sourcing information discovered in the Podesta Email leaks provided by Wikileaks in OCTOBER of 2016. It began when I noticed something in the Podesta emails that appeared to be code words because it didn’t make any sense that someone wanted to rent a pizza for an hour, and said so on Twitter. One of my followers picked up on it, and started searching for all references related to pizza, and connected the dots on the code words. Then Brian Austin (“0 Hour”) connected the symbolism and code words from FBI files and THAT is what started the crowd sourcing on 4Chan, and Reddit that uncovered the overwhelming evidence on Comet Pizza and other pedophile networks in general, commonly now known as PizzaGate. The hashtag “#PizzaGate” was trending on Twitter, and covered by several others long before Alex caught wind of it. Alex was even being criticized for NOT covering it which makes it clear he wasn’t behind it. Furthermore, no mainstream media was covering the issue until at least 3 weeks of it being viral. Thus, MSNBC couldn’t have been behind it, either.


For the DS to have “planted” these code words, the DS would have had to anticipate Podesta being hacked, and planted these code words in the emails ahead of the hacks in the hopes that they would be found by someone perusing through the Wikileaks files. Not only is that an absurd assumption, but if the DS planted these code words to implicate themselves as a distraction, what would that say about all of the other bombshells found in the Podesta emails? Did the DS plant all of that, too? and we just haven’t figured out the sleight-of-hand yet?

Jones claims PG was a distraction to cover up larger pedophile issues. How it gets much bigger than high-level politicians being involved in, and financing pedophile networks is beyond me, but I digress. Mike Cernovich then provided the details as to why it was a distraction: because DS were using a swinger club in DC to frame would-be Trump staffers by drugging them, staging nude photo shoots with them and an underage girl/boy, which in turn would be used for blackmail. Now as plausible as that story is (although no evidence was provided yet for this), it ultimately comes down to  child exploitation and extortion surrounding security clearances which is quite innocuous in comparison to children being actually raped and murdered as implied in the PG scandal. If anything, Pizza Gate has drawn national attention to the problem of sex trafficking among politicians, and has focused on the powers-that-be that finance it, instead of simply busting the low-level customers and an occasional warehouse.

This begs the question: why would the DS use something as egregious as a pedophile scandal to cover up something far less ominous? Secondly, the PG story broke in October. Trump was not even elected yet. So how could the DS have used Pizza Gate as a distraction from security clearance scandals when it was not yet known whether security clearances for Trump would even need to be manipulated given that he had not even been elected president yet?


Alex also blamed the push of Pizza Gate on INTERNET TROLLS. This was probably the straw that broke the camels back on my support for Infowars-and many others. What an insult because the MAJORITY of the people investigating PG were INFO WARS SUPPORTERS. Some of these supporters actually appeared on Alex’s show (author, Britney Pettibone, Doug Hagmann, Former CIA/FBI Steve Pieczenik, et al), and apparently, his own staff, Joe Biggs, is an internet troll, as well as Mike Flynn, Jr, Joe Rogan, former Huff Post journalist, David Seamands, and let’s not forget that Mike Cernovich himself was pushing PG until his RECENT interview on Infowars. So to blame PG on “a bunch of internet trolls” is a slap in the face to the people who have loyally supported and defended Alex Jones, and even Mike Cernovich (in spite of some of his questionable history over allegedly  defending rape).


The question I’ve always wrestled with is that if Jones exposes the false dichotomy of the Republican/Democrat system, how could he be controlled opposition? It’s pretty simple. The country has already been awakened to the false dichotomy party system and has developed a third alternative. The plan is to ALSO control the alternative. But then why would Alex expose so much corruption? Answer: because the corruption can’t be stopped anyway and it doesn’t matter because the globalists are intent on moving forward with their schemes whether you know about it or not. Satan’s plan is to get America on a collision course with God. Provoking God and the weakening of the American foundations is far more effective at implementing the demise of America than brute force communistic hostile takeover measures.

What stops corruption are people in position with a moral conscience who acknowledge the God of the Bible, and submits to God as the Bible describes Him. Alex Jones does NOT acknowledge the God of the Bible, but a New Age, humanist version of Him (Christian Syncretism), and THIS is the goal of controlled opposition: infiltrate the remaining conservatives and help distort their perception of what it truly means to be a Christian whose final authority is the Bible. The population can be ‘red pilled’ and ‘awoke’ all they want over what the globalists are planning because information is not power if it is based on half-baked truths.  God ultimately destroyed Sodom & Gomorrah for a lack of 10 righteous people. Yes, their immorality provoked him, but after Abraham interceded, God agreed to spare Sodom if Abraham could find ten righteous people. The goal of controlled opposition is to eliminate that righteous element by introducing a Laodicean type of so-called Christianity, instead of a Christianity whose view of objective moral absolutes are based on Sola Scriptura.

The devil already has the Left. They are corrupt, immoral, godless, and wicked to the bone. The right has sold out to much of the same. Now the goal is to turn the middle parties who have some semblance of Godliness left. With Infowars’ endorsement of Gay Rights, defense of pro choicers (defense of Tomi Lahren) and constant vilification of Bible believing ministries and street preachers, Infowars and their ilk have successfully redefined what it means to be conservative to the point that there’s not much of a recognizable difference anymore from the moral ideology of a Democrat from that of a modern-day conservative (or as Paul Joseph Watson of Infowars calls it, “the new punk”).

Alex accuses Bible believers of being DS plants to make him look bad. We think it’s the other way around. The bottom line to discern who the wolf is is to weigh their rhetoric and works against the teaching of Scripture. The less emphasis you put on absolute truth and Sola Scriptura, the more likely YOU are the one being deceived. Alex champions the power of the universe and the human spirit in being able to save humanity. The Bible, however, paints quite another story of the human condition: it’s corrupt, wicked, and requires a Saviour who ALONE provided the remedy. Any deviation from this Absolute Standard should make true Bible believing Christian skeptical, and proceed with caution when tuning in to Infowars.

For more on this dilemma, please see Why America May Not Survive Even If Trump Wins




Dr. James A., PhD

Dear Mr. Putin,

Rumor has it you hacked the election (not ‘actual’ hacking but Russian papers talked negatively about Hillary and influenced public opinion. So thank you for being the only news outlet on earth that gave a political candidate negative coverage in America. Yes, every major mainstream news outlet in the world criticized Trump, but that’s different-somehow). We know you can’t actually prove this to really take credit for it (neither can we), but the mainstream media repeats it everyday ad nauseum, so it must be true.

Thank you for protecting our religious rights. We know that even though most of your country is atheist, and you recently banned Christianity, you were at least concerned enough to make sure that America had the freedom to continue to send our missionaries to Russia. As you know, Democrats and the ACLU are atheists and want to keep God and Christianity out of our schools and public life, much like in Russia. But, ever since you helped elect a conservative, it will be at least 4 more years until Democrats can finish the job on religious freedom that Communists started.

Thank you for helping the United States get rid of the fuel for our nuclear weapons by buying 20% of our Uranium from/through the Clinton Foundation. That will give our EPA one less thing to complain about, and could prevent John McCain from selling it to Syria.

Thank you for paying Bill Clinton over $500,000 for speeches he made in Russia. This sets a precedent for all future Toast Master speakers that public speaking actually does pay.

Thank you for putting in a president that wants to get rid of socialized health care. Yes, we know, Obamacare was much, much closer to the kind of government entitlements we see in Socialist/Communist countries, but we know you wanted to see America prosper even if our ideas on government programs are not as centralized as they are in yours.

Thank you for helping us build our depleted military back up. We know that you have been improving your military technology and would probably like to savor your ‘victory’ over Crimea and Ukraine, but should the US ever oppose such Russian actions in the future against other sovereign nations, we at least want to thank you for giving us a fighting chance by electing a president that wants to make our military great again and be a formidable might against Russia if the need ever arises.

Thank you for showing the world that being a psychic actually works. How else could you have known that those “hacked” mails would actually get Trump elected instead of one of the other 17 Republican candidates? Also, amazing that you even knew ahead of time that there was information in emails among Democrats to think of looking there in the first place. BRILLIANT!

I am a little perturbed that you made the average citizen find all the information through crowd sourcing. I believe it would have been much easier to just give us the most incriminating emails instead of batches that we all had to sift through. I mean, if you wanted to guarantee that Trump would be president, I think it was a little risky to give all that info in bulk to Wikileaks. Fortunately, we all found the information we needed just in time to get Trump elected.

Most of all, I want to thank you for electing a president that has nothing in common with you, even though having a conservative president is far less favorable to Russia than a Democrat being in office, and is likely the most counter-productive interference in an election in world history, especially from the land of the world’s greatest chess players.


Anti Communist, Anti Socialist, American Patriots for Trump,

Dr James A., PhD


Dr. James A., PhD

On March 10, 2017, AP reported that a judge in Wisconsin has blocked President Trump’s newly revised travel ban, again, under the false “Muslim Ban” moniker*. Source  Apparently, a Muslim man claims to have attempted to bring his family from Aleppo, Syria, after being granted asylum, but the process has been stalled for at least a year.

Stalled for a year.

This brings up an interesting point. Trump has only been president since January of 2017. This means that the litigant in this case was prevented from bringing his family to America under the Obama administration. SO WHY DIDN’T THE ACLU SUE OBAMA FOR A “MUSLIM BAN”??? And how is it that the GROUNDS for challenging the prevention of his family coming to the U.S. have CHANGED now that Trump is president?

This is a lawsuit of convenience where a liberal attorney cherry picked a case that he/she could convert into an argument against Trump’s vetting. It is a clear abuse of process and patently frivolous. This type of judicial activism is demeaning to our justice system.

I have a solution, however. Since it appears that the ACLU and other liberal, globalist law firms will continue to judge-shop and use the courts to attack Trump, Republicans can and should do the same thing. Fight fire with Fire. Find a case, sue Trump, and lose on purpose! Let me explain.

There are 2 rules that prevent re-litigation of a case: Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel (One prevents litigation of the same case after judgment, the other prevents attack on the same issues of a case). The attorney simply finds a litigant willing to file a lawsuit in a known conservative judge’s court (i.e., conservative judge shopping). This will result in a decision in SUPPORT of Trump’s travel ban. The effect this will have is that other district courts will not be able to cite another federal district court’s banning of Trump’s order, and will force the cases into the appellate courts and cause a split among the circuits that will have to be resolved by the Supreme Court.

Trump and his supporters need to take the gloves off. We won the election, but liberals & globalists are doing all they can to make Trump a lame-duck president. We shouldn’t let them get away with it, and it’s time to fight back as dirty as they do (minus the pedophilia).





Dr. James A., PhD.

New Bridge Church of Lawrenceville, Georgia,  has been openly critical of the IFB churches (independent fundamental Baptists) with many of their followers constantly criticizing adherents of the Twitter #Oldpaths trend. New Bridge has a similar format and creed as that of IFB critic, Christian Farris of Next Level “ministries”. These groups of IFB critics are always quick to point out the sins of Jack Schaap and other IFB who have been charged with sex crimes, as a grounds for discrediting the entire IFB environment.

On December 28, 2016, the youth pastor of New Bridge Church, Nicholas Kelley, was arrested for child molestation.

Although their lead pastor, Jeff Lyle, denies being a Calvinist or Arminian, his defense of Calvinist doctrines is typical of the type of “neutral” pastors these days that disguise their closet-Calvinism in nuance.

So apparently, sexual abuse of children occurs among the IFB critics as well. Who knew!


Dr. James A., PhD

There are several factors that don’t add up when we consider that “The Russians” “hacked” the DNC and Hillary’s private server.

First of all, of all the devices and internet depots the Russians could have thought to hack, why choose the emails of low level campaign strategists as opposed to other high level government officials? In other words, how would Russia even know that there was dirt in the DNC emails? As a former “hacktivist”, I never went on a fishing expedition without having some idea of what I was looking for. It seems obvious, and a matter of common sense, that Russia would have at least had to have had some idea of what was in those emails BEFORE hacking them to think that they in some way could have helped Trump. However, there’s no guarantee they would have even helped Trump, and not the other 17 candidates. If Trump was the intended recipient, it certainly doesn’t make sense to give the info to Wikileaks.

Secondly, if Russia was convinced that incriminating emails were among the DNC, then why not expedite the information by giving Wikileaks ONLY the incriminating documents instead of flooding Wikileaks with thousands upon thousands of emails. It was the American people who did most of the digging that found all of the incriminating information. Russia couldn’t have depending on a few Americans to simply find all the needles in the haystacks. Had Russia known for example, that Donna Brazille was feeding moderators debate questions, then why not just highlight THAT email instead of making us dig for all the dirt?

The better and more likely, explanation is that somebody already on the inside knew what was in those emails, or what could be in them, somebody like Seth Rich.

Thirdly, regarding Hillary’s private server. If Russia targeted that as well, how did they even know to look for classified information on a private server? It’s one thing to know in advance that Hillary has private emails with classified government information on GOVERNMENT servers, quite another to KNOW that she is storing them on a private server, at home [perhaps her maid was a Russian agent!]. Only very few people among the DNC, and evidence shows Obama likely knew, even knew Hillary had a private server. So if the revelation that Hillary had a private server was a surprise to other Democrat colleagues, how are we expected to believe that Russians knew about it? The only conceivable option here is that IF Russia knew about the server, it was because Hillary gave them the IP (more on that below), and hence the 33K emails-and more-that were deleted were likely to cover up the ONE email that they didn’t want found: the smoking gun that she communicated the location of her private server to a foreign state actor.

The more plausible story is that Hillary Clinton pulled a Robert Hanssen. Hanssen was a high level CIA operative that eventually got caught selling secrets to Russia. He would sneak docs out of the CIA, then place them under a bridge and inform Russian agents of the pick up spot. In this case, Hillary’s private server acted as the “pick up” spot. In my opinion, Hillary let the Chinese, Saudi’s, et al, know she had a private server and for a hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation (including agreements to pay Bill Clinton $500K a speech…IN RUSSIA), you could have access to the classified information on a private server located at IP………use port___________. Then “Oops, I got hacked”.

Democrats have also conveniently forgotten that Wikileaks was not the only source that proved corruption in the DNC. Project Veritas caught several DNC officials on video admitting to causing violence at Trump rallies and using buses to take extra voters around to polling stations to vote multiple times. Project Veritas was independent of the Wikileaks revelations, although their documentation confirmed the veracity of the Wikileaks documents.

Although Dr. Steve Pieczenik has already confirmed that it was insiders-including himself*- in the US that leaked the info to Wikileaks as a counter-coup against establishment collaborators, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the leaks-not hacks-were an inside job that had nothing to do with Russia.


Please also see our article on the CIA’s LGBT Agenda for additional arguments that debunk the “Russians Also Hacked The RNC” nonsense.

*Kim Dot Com has given explicit details confirming Seth Rich was a source (he also confirmed this to Sean Hannity), who was murdered for his involvement in exposing the DNC’s corruption. Kim vowed to testify before Congress provided he be granted immunity from prosecution on an unrelated matter prior to the election.


Dr. James A., PhD

In a shark-jumping tactic to assist crooked Hillary overtake Donald Trump’s presidency, the CIA (at least as far as the mainstream media tells us) has “confirmed” that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to assist Donald Trump. Infowars (1st hour, Dec 14, 2016, with Larry Nichols) reports that the CIA is actively attempting to convince the electoral college to change their vote (or at least abstain until “further investigation” can be conducted. Why “further” investigation is necessary if there was conclusive evidence is beyond me, but I digress). Ah! Remember when Democrats complained that FBI Director Comey was in violation of the “Hatch Act” for “attempting to influence the election”! Apparently, the CIA is exempt.

Donald Trump has dismissed this “Russia did it” propaganda for the conspiratorial fake news that it is. Others, such as intelligence specialist Steve Pieczenik-who claimed that the FBI was responsible for leaking the information to Wikileaks-has also harpooned the Russian shark. But the defense liberal Democrats foist upon the safety-pin generation is that the CIA has no standing in politics, and is therefore an unbiased third-party providing only intelligence that affects the national security of the country.

I beg to differ.

From the CIA’s official, verified Twitter account, behold the CIA’s agenda to promote LGBTism. I have warned about the LGBT Trojan Horse in other articles (The Daniel Trap), how it is a globalist agenda to destroy Christianity and provoke God’s wrath. I think this proves it. What on earth is an INTELLIGENCE AGENCY doing promoting political and social issues like LGBTism? The CIA claims they PUSHED the agenda for “fairness and equality in the workplace” and were instrumental in playing a key role in providing an LGBT inclusive work environment.

Therefore, the CIA is not simply an intelligence agency designed to provide the president with sensitive information for the protection of national interests, but is actively involved in politics by engaging in propaganda that shapes the moral views of the country. If the CIA has this kind of stake in ethics, then the Democrat’s and traitor Republicans can not argue that the CIA is not motivated by politics. And, if the CIA can be shown to be involved in politics, there’s no grounds to oppose objections that they may have a political motivation for claiming that Russia interfered with the election.


Furthermore, the CIA also claimed that Russia hacked the GOP and simply withheld the information. There’s three reasons why this is ludicrous.

  1. If the Republicans had hack-worthy dirty on Trump, they would have used it. Republicans fought Trump hard in the primaries, started Never Trump in the general, and are still trying to unseat him in the electoral college, not to mention they didn’t contribute one dime to Trump’s campaign. Russia hacking the GOP doesn’t eliminate the knowledge of what other Republicans would have already known about Trump before the “hack”. Even if Russia hacked the GOP, that wouldn’t prevent Republicans from using information against Trump they were already privy to prior to any hack.
  2. If the Russians gave the information to Trump to use against other Republicans, then every one of them were silent about their source. If Trump would have used any information about something gleaned from hacked emails, any Republican would’ve immediately seized on the opportunity to accuse Trump of obtaining illegally obtained classified or private information. No Republican ever accused Trump of using hacked dirt on them to win the primary election.
  3. During the general election, intelligence agents met with Hillary to claim that Russia may be involved in interfering with the election. However, no intelligence agents ever met with Trump. Now don’t you think Trump deserved to be briefed by intelligence agencies if the party whose ticket he is on was hacked? Or do intelligence agencies only brief Democrat candidates when the DNC is “hacked”, but leave Republicans in the dark? When only one candidate gets “briefed” that smacks of partisanship, and more likely, a Plan B because the real polls, and the thousands attending Trump rallies, were showing an inevitable Hillary loss.

Vice President-Elect, Mike Pence, is also known for his opposition to the LGBT agenda. Could it be that the CIA is afraid that Pence will be a thorn in the LGBT agenda that the CIA admitted pushed for? Or perhaps Trump’s wall will put a damper on those Fast & Furious operations and ruin those Barry Seal deals with the Mexican Cartels!

One thing is clear, the other…not so much. What is not clear-and frankly, more likely fake news-is that Russia had anything to do with the election. What is clear is that the CIA has a political motivation to make it look that way.


NOTE: Please see also our other article on the things that Russia would have had to know to even consider hacking the DNC


Dr. James A., PhD

A recent so-called “shooter” entered Comet Pizza, where the infamous “Pizza Gate” scandal is centered, only to learn later that the suspect involved was a paid actor named Edgar Maddison Welch.

Today, MSNBC released an article from a person defending Comet Pizza. The defender, Indira Lakshmanan, is described by MSNBC as a “Comet Pizza Regular”, as if she is an ordinary, everyday average customer. It has become a common practice for me to look names up on Wikileaks and IMBD because mainstream media has become notorious for producing fake news, and sure enough, there it was: she’s a paid actor that’s not only a “regular” at Comet Pizza, but a regular of MSNBC.



Dr. James A., PhD

I’m leaving the website up because myself and others have written some helpful articles. But I’m deleting my Twitter and Gab accounts. Too much drama. The Republican party is unrecognizable, and conservative has lost its meaning. I like Trump’s ideas, and his patriotism, and he has the right political ideas to actually make America great, politically. But what made America great wasn’t her sense of freedom, but her grounding in Biblical principles which spawned those concepts of freedom. Republican party adherents want the freedom, but not the Godliness that grounded it in the inherent dignity that humans have because we were made in the image of God, endowed with certain inalienable rights from our Creator.

This week, if I get to it, I’m going to write something that’s bothered me for a while, and it’s the Infowars movement, and so-called “alt right” media. Alex Jones, Breitbart, Drudge Report, et al, are all good for accurate media and honest reporting, but I’m afraid that it’s actually a tool of the devil to draw what’s left of conservatism into their web of moral relativism and religious syncretism. Being right about politics and current events is useless if you interpret the info through the wrong lenses, and it doesn’t encourage Godliness. The devil already has the ‘Left’, and now he needs to corrupt the other side, and I believe he’s using independent media to do it. Therefore, I’m retreating from certain platforms because my conscience can no longer bear engaging with those I’d have been completely separated from before the election.

Moreover, I am especially disturbed at how these independent “alt right” media have vilified sites like NowTheEndBegins.Com as if Bible believers, as Alex Jones put it, were attempting to make them look bad and are “Pharisees” because we believe that Jesus Christ is THE way, not *A* way to eternal life and Godliness, and that the only true source of knowledge about God is grounded in Scripture, not some New Age concept of “human consciousness” that tries to amalgamate some truths of Scripture with various tenants of Hinduism, Wicca, Buddhism, and Humanism. It does absolutely no good to expose globalism for what it is, while on the other hand, pushing the agenda of the antichrist. For just a small example of the New Age nonsense put out by see here, here, and this doozy. If you want to do further research, here’s an entire list of articles to peruse. Sorry Alex, and Infomercials, but pornography is not “art”*, and achieving some higher consciousness and discovering the secrets of the universe while occasionally giving Jesus Christ a tepid shout-out will send you to hell just as fast as worshiping Allah, Mary, and Buddha. Jesus said He is THE way, THE truth, THE life (John 14:6), and there is NONE OTHER name under heaven given to men whereby one can be saved outside of the name of Jesus Christ (Acts 4:12).

I won’t call Infowars and their ilk, “fake news”. Fake news is clearly produced primarily by the mainstream media. But Infowars is attracting people through actual honest reporting of events, but mixing in erroneous spiritual views that will damn this country, as well as the individuals who listen who have no discernment or grounding from Scripture. There’s more to that which I will explain later. I’m not saying avoid Infowars, et al, altogether, but view it with discernment, and know prophecy to be able to interpret events and keep them in their proper context.

I’ve given some other reasons here regarding why America may still lose even with a Trump win- Here


*On July 21, 2016, Alex Jones interviewed Roger Stone about the media releasing nude photos of Melania Trump, wife of president-elect Donald Trump. Jones quipped, “thank God she’s there, frankly I love her more now. European women have some really hot women, and that’s God’s creation, those photos are a work of art”. That’s not something any professing Christian would say, let alone a man faithfully committed to a wife. See Here At 8:32